laravel-ai-sdk-integration

laravel-ai-sdk-integration is a cursor rule for Cursor from laragentic/agents. It costs 491 tokens per session, scanned A, original, no licence file.

Rules for connecting Laragentic with the Laravel AI SDK, a Laravel library for working with AI services, and for extending that connection.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps developers implement or review Laragentic code that depends on the Laravel AI SDK.
Why use it?
It clarifies how the package should use the SDK without creating inconsistent integrations.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/laragentic/agents/laravel-ai-sdk-integration
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/laragentic/agents

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for laravel-ai-sdk-integration

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/laragentic/agents/laravel-ai-sdk-integration.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/laragentic/agents/laravel-ai-sdk-integration)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/laragentic/agents/laravel-ai-sdk-integration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/laragentic/agents/laravel-ai-sdk-integration.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 491 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 491 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00491 $0.00491
Opus 5 $0.00246 $0.00246
Sonnet 5 $0.00098 $0.00098
Haiku 4.5 $0.00049 $0.00049

Measured 5d ago against content hash 47398f9fe917, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-05, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

laravel-ai-sdk-integration scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/laravel-ai-sdk-integration.mdc · 47 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 47 lines · 491 tokens per session scan A 47398f9fe917

Subscribe to this mod's changes

laravel-ai-sdk-integration is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository laragentic/agents (13 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 491 tokens to every session, about $0.0025 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.