language-coach

language-coach is a cursor rule for Cursor from leeguooooo/prompt-language-coach. It costs 174 tokens per session, scanned A, original, no licence file.

A language-coaching rule that corrects your writing in your target language before answering each prompt.

In plain words
What is it for?
Practising target-language writing while asking the coding agent other questions.
Why use it?
It adds corrections to regular agent conversations without requiring a separate language exercise.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Written for Cursor: a Cursor rule (.mdc).

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/leeguooooo/prompt-language-coach/language-coach
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/leeguooooo/prompt-language-coach

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for language-coach

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/leeguooooo/prompt-language-coach/language-coach.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/leeguooooo/prompt-language-coach/language-coach)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/leeguooooo/prompt-language-coach/language-coach"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/leeguooooo/prompt-language-coach/language-coach.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 174 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 174 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00174 $0.00174
Opus 5 $0.00087 $0.00087
Sonnet 5 $0.00035 $0.00035
Haiku 4.5 $0.00017 $0.00017

Measured 6d ago against content hash 776d007a128e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-06, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

language-coach scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

cursor-rules/language-coach.mdc · 16 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 16 lines · 174 tokens per session scan A 776d007a128e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

language-coach is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository leeguooooo/prompt-language-coach (16 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 174 tokens to every session, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.