Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve/pre-commit-lint-format)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve/pre-commit-lint-format"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve/pre-commit-lint-format/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve/pre-commit-lint-format"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve/pre-commit-lint-format.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00376 | $0.00376 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00150 | $0.00150 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00075 | $0.00075 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00038 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
pre-commit-lint-format scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Pre-commit: format, lint, and unit tests before every commit
Always run all three checks on the changed files before staging and committing. A missed step is the most common cause of a red CI check.
1. Format
# Format changed files
npx prettier --write "<path(s) to changed files>"
# Verify formatting passes CI check
yarn format:check "<path(s) to changed files>"
The CI "Code Quality Checks" job runs yarn format:check over all files and fails if any file has Prettier diffs.
2. Lint
# Lint (repo-wide; use --filter to scope when faster)
yarn lint
3. Unit tests
# Full test suite (server vitest + Angular builder)
yarn test
The CI "Code Quality Checks" job runs yarn test across all packages. Always run this locally before committing — the most common test failures are:
- A new method added to a service but not added to the service mock in the component spec (causes
TypeError: this.fooService.newMethod is not a functionas an unhandled exception at runtime, which CI counts as a test failure even if the assertion tests all pass) - A shared constant renamed without updating the spec that imports it
When adding a method to a service that already has a spec and a mock provider, always add the method to the mock's useValue object in the spec.
Run order
Format → lint → test. If any step fails, fix before committing.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 46 lines · 376 tokens per session scan A 370b3e9394eb
pre-commit-lint-format is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository linuxfoundation/lfx-self-serve (14 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 376 tokens to every session, about $0.0015 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
commit-checks
Run gofmt, go vet, and unit tests before committing Go files.
git
A Git workflow rule set covering branch names, commit messages, and pull-request titles, with issue IDs linking changes to tracked work.
workflow
Development workflow and commit practices.
hook-commits
Set up pre-commit hooks with lint-staged (Prettier), type checking, and tests in the current repo. Use when user wants to add pre-commit hooks, set up Husky, configure lint-staged, or add commit-time formatting/typechecking/testing.
cmd-build
Implement the next task incrementally — build, test, verify, commit.
issue-workflow
GitHub issue workflow and mandatory manual-test handoff for UI/behavior changes.