Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lucamezzalira/mfe-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/lucamezzalira/mfe-skills/mfe-boundary-code-patterns)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/lucamezzalira/mfe-skills/mfe-boundary-code-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/lucamezzalira/mfe-skills/mfe-boundary-code-patterns/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/lucamezzalira/mfe-skills/mfe-boundary-code-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/lucamezzalira/mfe-skills/mfe-boundary-code-patterns.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.01349 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00540 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00270 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00135 |
Grade A, and why
mfe-boundary-code-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 146 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code generation patterns by rule
Toolchain-specific examples for applying the boundary rules when generating MFE code. Organised by concern so you can load only what you need. React, Angular / Native Federation, Vue, and Single SPA are covered where they differ.
Contents
- URL routing — shell first segment only; MFE owns depth below (Rule 7)
- Shell platform events — allowed; domain events in shell — not (Rules 4, 7)
- Shell mounting — always include a fallback in the shell, not inside the micro-frontend (Rule 6)
- Props — pass identifiers, not domain objects (Rule 2)
- Same-page communication (horizontal split) — event emitter between peers, never shared state (Rule 4)
- Shell platform bus — chrome only (Rules 4, 7)
- Cross-area navigation and data — first segment switches MFE; depth stays in MFE (Rules 4, 7)
URL routing — shell first segment only; MFE owns depth below (Rule 7)
- Shell: load only first-level paths from a runtime manifest (
routes.json+remotes.json) so adding/removing an MFE does not require shell code changes or redeploy for MFE-internal pages - MFE: hardcoded internal routes are expected (
/product/:idunder/catalog); new sub-pages are MFE-only deploys - Navigation implementation: flexible (
<a>,<Link>,navigate(), etc.) — enforce URL depth ownership, not a specific router API - Cross-area navigation: change the first URL segment; deeper segments stay inside the owning MFE
// ✓ Shell — manifest-driven first segment (wildcard → remote)
// routes.json: { "path": "/catalog/*", "scope": "catalog_mfe", "module": "./CatalogApp" }
routes.map((r) => <Route key={r.scope} path={r.path} element={<RemoteMount ... />} />)
// ✓ Catalog MFE — hardcoded routes under basename (no shell change when adding pages)
<BrowserRouter basename="/catalog">
<Routes>
<Route path="/product/:productId" element={<ProductDetail />} />
</Routes>
</BrowserRouter>
// ✗ Shell — domain sub-route
<Route path="/catalog/product/:productId" element={...} />
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 146 lines · 1,349 tokens per session scan A da209c38e88f
mfe-boundary-code-patterns is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository lucamezzalira/mfe-skills (53 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 1,349 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-23.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.
config-validation-and-normalization
Config validation and normalization responsibilities (defineConfig normalizes, the orm section schema validates and resolves paths, the loader reports per-section diagnostics).
control-plane-descriptors
Control plane descriptor and instance implementation patterns.