Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lucamezzalira/mfe-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/lucamezzalira/mfe-skills/mfe-boundary-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/lucamezzalira/mfe-skills/mfe-boundary-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/lucamezzalira/mfe-skills/mfe-boundary-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/lucamezzalira/mfe-skills/mfe-boundary-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/lucamezzalira/mfe-skills/mfe-boundary-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00185 | $0.03154 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00093 | $0.01577 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00631 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00315 |
Grade A, and why
mfe-boundary-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 263 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
MFE boundary health
Reviews and generates micro-frontend code against the eight boundary rules from Building Micro-Frontends (O'Reilly). All rules are tool-agnostic. Full rule definitions, violation signals, and code-checkable patterns are in references/rules-core.md — load it when you need the detail for a specific rule.
On every activation, apply this summary table directly — no file load needed:
| Rule | What to check in code | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 — Business subdomain | Name reflects a business capability, not a UI element | High |
| 2 — Minimal API surface | Fewer than 5 props; no full domain objects passed | Critical |
| 3 — Hide implementation details | No direct imports from another MFE's internals | Critical |
| 4 — Events not shared state | No shared store; shell handles shell:* only; domain events peer-to-peer or URL |
Critical |
| 5 — Independent deployment | No versioned URLs in shell config; no build-time MFE imports; no CI pipeline coupling | High |
| 6 — Isolate failure | Every remote mount has a fallback in the shell | High |
| 7 — Coarse-grained | Nesting depth > 1 (MFE inside MFE); more than 3 MFEs per view | High |
| 8 — Single-team ownership | One team in CODEOWNERS; no cross-team sign-off on internals | High |
For full rule definitions and violation signals: load references/rules-core.md.
For framework-specific patterns (MF v2, Angular/Native Federation, Single SPA): load references/rules-toolchain.md.
For URL routing ownership (shell first segment, MFE deeper paths): load references/routing-ownership.md.
For fix patterns and step-by-step remediation: load references/remediation.md when the user asks how to fix a violation or requests a migration plan.
Cold start: new project
If no boundaries exist yet, ask about the highest-priority unknown first — one question per turn. Do not generate implementation code until each check is resolved.
Check 1 — Team ownership Ask: "Which team will own this micro-frontend end-to-end — design, development, deployment, and operations?" If unresolved: do not generate implementation code. Ask the user to install the micro-frontend-canvas skill and complete a canvas iteration (see https://github.com/lucamezzalira/mfe-canvas).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 263 lines · 185 tokens per session scan A 23a171d3b8b7
mfe-boundary-review is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository lucamezzalira/mfe-skills (51 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 185 tokens to every session and 3,154 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
pages
Source: docs/agents/pages.md Regenerate: npm run agents:sync -w packages/openbridge-webcomponents -->.
shadcn-tailwind-guide
A guide to building new components with shadcn/ui and Tailwind CSS, a utility-based system for styling interfaces.
css-render-blocking-diagnosis
Cursor rule "css-render-blocking-diagnosis" from adobecom/da-express-milo, covering css render-blocking diagnosis & resolution, critical learning from 98 pagespeed achievement, primary diagnostic protocol, step 1: css blocking symptom recognition and step 2: css loading sequence audit.
frontend-architecture
Vite + React SPA architecture - directory layout, providers, bundle splitting. Tailwind styling in tailwind.mdc.
web-pages-e2e-test-maintenance
Keep web pages end-to-end coverage current.
tanstack-react-router_routing
TanStack Router: Routing.