Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/luxvil/ai-coding-rules/63-stack-dbgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Luxvil/ai-coding-rulesWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00576 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00288 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00115 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
63-stack-db scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to 63-stack-db — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Database Rules
Migrations
- Use transactions where supported.
- Ensure down migrations are safe or explicitly irreversible.
- Schema changes require migrations — no manual DB edits.
Queries
- Prefer parameterized queries — never concatenate user input.
- Document performance-critical queries with EXPLAIN output.
- Avoid
SELECT *— select only needed fields.
Indexes
- Add indexes only for real query patterns.
- Verify cardinality and expected benefit before adding.
- Index columns used in WHERE, JOIN, and ORDER BY clauses.
Data Integrity
- Use PRIMARY KEY, FOREIGN KEY, UNIQUE, CHECK constraints.
- Handle cascade deletes deliberately — document behavior.
- Prefer soft deletes (
deleted_at) for recoverable data.
Supabase RLS Patterns (Optional)
Apply when working with Supabase Row-Level Security policies.
Enable RLS (MANDATORY)
- Enable RLS on ALL tables with user data
- No exceptions — even admin tables need policies
- Use permissive policies as default
Performance Optimization (CRITICAL)
Function Caching Pattern
-- ❌ BAD: Function called per row — O(N × f(C))
CREATE POLICY "Users see own data"
ON documents FOR SELECT
USING (auth.uid() = user_id);
-- ✅ GOOD: Function cached once — O(N + f(C))
CREATE POLICY "Users see own data"
ON documents FOR SELECT
USING ((SELECT auth.uid()) = user_id);
Impact: 170ms → <10ms on million-row datasets (17x improvement)
Join Direction Optimization
-- ❌ BAD: Subquery evaluated per row
USING (user_id IN (SELECT id FROM team_members WHERE team_id = ...));
-- ✅ GOOD: Array comparison with cached subquery
USING (user_id = ANY(ARRAY(SELECT id FROM team_members WHERE team_id = ...)));
Null User Handling
-- ✅ Always guard against null auth
USING (
auth.uid() IS NOT NULL
AND (SELECT auth.uid()) = user_id
);
Indexing for RLS
- Index ALL columns used in RLS policies
- Priority:
user_id,tenant_id,organization_id - Composite indexes for multi-column policies
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 86 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 30a4d4341a61
63-stack-db is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository Luxvil/ai-coding-rules (3 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 576 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to 63-stack-db, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
exam-answer-format
Guidelines for writing exam-style answers in a practical, conversational style with definitions first followed by real-world examples.
lecture-reference-linking
Guidelines for including course materials lists and inline references when writing exam answers or documentation that references course materials.
short-answer-version
Guidelines for creating short/concise versions of detailed answers.
documentation-formatting
Guidelines for formatting markdown documentation to improve readability and scannability.
mermaid-diagrams
Guidelines for adding Mermaid diagrams to exam answers and documentation with automatic SVG generation support.
human-writing-style
Rules for writing naturally and authentically - avoid robotic AI tone in documentation, code comments, error messages, and explanations. Write like a human colleague, not a customer service bot.