63-stack-db

Rules for editing SQL, database migrations, or a database schema—the structure that defines tables, fields, and relationships. They cover safe schema changes, secure queries, indexes, data-integrity constraints, and optional Supabase access policies.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use them when writing queries, creating migrations, changing tables, adding indexes, or configuring Supabase Row-Level Security, which controls which users can access rows.
Why use it?
They reduce risks such as data loss, SQL injection, slow queries, inconsistent records, and unsafe manual schema changes.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/luxvil/ai-coding-rules/63-stack-db
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Luxvil/ai-coding-rules

Made for: Cursor.

Per session 0 Nothing until a file matches its globs; then the whole rule loads.
When invoked 576 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.00576
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00288
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00115
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00058

Measured yesterday against content hash 30a4d4341a61, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

63-stack-db scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to 63-stack-db — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.cursor/rules/63-stack-db.mdc · 86 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Database Rules

Migrations

  • Use transactions where supported.
  • Ensure down migrations are safe or explicitly irreversible.
  • Schema changes require migrations — no manual DB edits.

Queries

  • Prefer parameterized queries — never concatenate user input.
  • Document performance-critical queries with EXPLAIN output.
  • Avoid SELECT * — select only needed fields.

Indexes

  • Add indexes only for real query patterns.
  • Verify cardinality and expected benefit before adding.
  • Index columns used in WHERE, JOIN, and ORDER BY clauses.

Data Integrity

  • Use PRIMARY KEY, FOREIGN KEY, UNIQUE, CHECK constraints.
  • Handle cascade deletes deliberately — document behavior.
  • Prefer soft deletes (deleted_at) for recoverable data.

Supabase RLS Patterns (Optional)

Apply when working with Supabase Row-Level Security policies.

Enable RLS (MANDATORY)

  • Enable RLS on ALL tables with user data
  • No exceptions — even admin tables need policies
  • Use permissive policies as default

Performance Optimization (CRITICAL)

Function Caching Pattern
-- ❌ BAD: Function called per row — O(N × f(C))
CREATE POLICY "Users see own data"
ON documents FOR SELECT
USING (auth.uid() = user_id);

-- ✅ GOOD: Function cached once — O(N + f(C))
CREATE POLICY "Users see own data"
ON documents FOR SELECT
USING ((SELECT auth.uid()) = user_id);

Impact: 170ms → <10ms on million-row datasets (17x improvement)

Join Direction Optimization
-- ❌ BAD: Subquery evaluated per row
USING (user_id IN (SELECT id FROM team_members WHERE team_id = ...));

-- ✅ GOOD: Array comparison with cached subquery
USING (user_id = ANY(ARRAY(SELECT id FROM team_members WHERE team_id = ...)));

Null User Handling

-- ✅ Always guard against null auth
USING (
  auth.uid() IS NOT NULL
  AND (SELECT auth.uid()) = user_id
);

Indexing for RLS

  • Index ALL columns used in RLS policies
  • Priority: user_id, tenant_id, organization_id
  • Composite indexes for multi-column policies

Read the full file on GitHub · 86 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 86 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 30a4d4341a61

Subscribe to this mod's changes

63-stack-db is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository Luxvil/ai-coding-rules (3 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 576 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to 63-stack-db, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.