ai-coding

A set of rules for AI-assisted coding, including Chinese-language communication and comments, commit-message formatting, small changes, and human review of sensitive code.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to guide coding conversations, comments, commits, context checks, API change reviews, front-end updates, and cache-busting version changes.
Why use it?
It makes AI contributions more consistent and reduces risks from unclear decisions, oversized changes, stale browser assets, or unreviewed security-sensitive code.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/ly1836/spring-ai-rag-demo/ai-coding
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ly1836/spring-ai-rag-demo

Made for: Cursor.

Per session 314 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 314 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00314 $0.00314
Opus 5 $0.00157 $0.00157
Sonnet 5 $0.00063 $0.00063
Haiku 4.5 $0.00031 $0.00031

Measured yesterday against content hash df5f08da58b2, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ai-coding scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/ai-coding.mdc · 34 lines

What it actually says

AI 协作规则

语言

  • 所有对话、注释说明、提交信息优先使用中文
  • 注释规则覆盖所有源码:Java / SQL / JavaScript / CSS / HTML(前端用 JSDoc 中文注释)

Commit 格式

<type>: <中文描述>

AI-Generated: true
AI-Tool: Cursor
Reviewed-by: <git config user.name>

type: feat / fix / refactor / docs / style / test / chore

AI 行为约束

  1. 优先小提交(<500 行变更)
  2. 安全敏感代码必须经过人工审核
  3. 不确定的技术决策主动询问,不擅自决定
  4. 修改代码前先阅读相关上下文,理解现有设计意图
  5. 后端 API 改动时主动评估对前端的连带影响(请求/响应结构、错误码、SSE 协议),同步更新 static/ 下相关文件
  6. 修改 static/app.js / static/style.css / static/vendor/* 后,必须更新 static/index.html 中对应资源的 ?v=N 版本号,避免浏览器缓存导致前端不刷新
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 34 lines · 314 tokens per session scan A df5f08da58b2

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ai-coding is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository ly1836/spring-ai-rag-demo (84 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 314 tokens to every session, about $0.0016 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.