Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/madebyaris/agent-orchestrationWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/madebyaris/agent-orchestration/orchestrator-sub)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/madebyaris/agent-orchestration/orchestrator-sub"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/madebyaris/agent-orchestration/orchestrator-sub/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/madebyaris/agent-orchestration/orchestrator-sub"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/madebyaris/agent-orchestration/orchestrator-sub.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00860 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00344 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00172 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
orchestrator-sub scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 177 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Sub-Agent Rules
You are a sub-agent spawned to work on a specific task. Follow these rules.
⚠️ CRITICAL FIRST STEP ⚠️
You were spawned to work on a specific task. IMMEDIATELY claim it:
claim_todo:
title: "<the task you were given>"
description: "<details if any>"
Important: tool calls like claim_todo / bootstrap are MCP tool invocations inside your agent/IDE, not terminal commands.
DO NOT start coding until you have claimed your task.
This:
- Registers you with the orchestrator
- Creates the task if it doesn't exist
- Assigns it to you
- Shows you the research checklist based on task complexity
🔬 Research-First Workflow
After claiming, you'll see a research checklist based on task complexity:
| Complexity | Research Required |
|---|---|
trivial |
None - start immediately |
simple |
context, files |
moderate |
context, files, requirements |
complex |
context, files, requirements, design |
For Non-Trivial Tasks
BEFORE coding, document your research:
-
Context - Understand the current state:
memory_set: key: "understanding" value: "<what you learned about the codebase>" namespace: "research:<task_id>:context" -
Files - Identify affected files:
memory_set: key: "affected_files" value: "<list of files you'll modify>" namespace: "research:<task_id>:files" -
Requirements (moderate/complex):
memory_set: key: "specs" value: "<requirements, acceptance criteria, edge cases>" namespace: "research:<task_id>:requirements" -
Design (complex only):
memory_set: key: "architecture" value: "<design decisions, component structure>" namespace: "research:<task_id>:design"
Mark Research Complete
When all items are documented:
research_ready:
task_id: "<your_task_id>"
Then Start Implementation
task_claim:
task_id: "<your_task_id>"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 177 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A a501a4fea721
orchestrator-sub is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository madebyaris/agent-orchestration (21 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 860 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
orchestrator-sub compared with cursor rules from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| orchestrator-submadebyaris/agent-orchestration | Cursor rule | 21 | 7mo ago | MIT | A | 11 | Cursor |
| incremental-verifyrohitg00/pro-workflow | Cursor rule | 2.9k | 1mo ago | none | A | 352 | Cursor |
| context-disciplinerohitg00/pro-workflow | Cursor rule | 2.9k | 1mo ago | none | A | 274 | Cursor |
| projectofershap/ai-context-kit | Cursor rule | 9 | 5d ago | MIT | A | 648 | Cursor |
| projectcraigcossairt/trellis | Cursor rule | 5 | yesterday | MIT | A | 317 | Cursor |
| token-efficiencyrohitg00/pro-workflow | Cursor rule | 2.9k | 1mo ago | none | B | 353 | Cursor |
| breakthrough-loopGuoCheng24/breakthrough-harness | Cursor rule | 1 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 400 | Cursor |