commit-conventions

Rules for writing commit messages and pull-request titles in a scaffold repository and its vllm-ascend submodule. A submodule is a separate repository included inside another repository.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when committing or opening pull requests. The scaffold uses conventional commit types such as feat, fix, refactor, docs, chore, and test; the submodule has its own current rules.
Why use it?
It keeps repository history and review requests consistent, while avoiding the mistake of applying the parent repository's rules to the submodule.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/maoxx241/vllm-ascend-workspace/commit-conventions
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/maoxx241/vllm-ascend-workspace

Made for: Cursor.

Per session 16 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 134 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00016 $0.00134
Opus 5 $0.00008 $0.00067
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00027
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00013

Measured 3d ago against content hash cac84062ed10, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

commit-conventions scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/commit-conventions.mdc · 21 lines

What it actually says

Commit Conventions

Scaffold repository (this repo)

Standard conventional commits:

<type>: <summary>

Types: feat, fix, refactor, docs, chore, test

vllm-ascend submodule

Commits inside vllm-ascend/ must follow the submodule's own conventions — always read vllm-ascend/AGENTS.md for the current commit format, sign-off requirements, and PR title rules.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 21 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A cac84062ed10

Subscribe to this mod's changes

commit-conventions is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository maoxx241/vllm-ascend-workspace (32 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 134 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.