Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/marcopesani/think-mcp-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/marcopesani/think-mcp-server/typescript)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/marcopesani/think-mcp-server/typescript"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/marcopesani/think-mcp-server/typescript/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/marcopesani/think-mcp-server/typescript"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/marcopesani/think-mcp-server/typescript.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00372 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00149 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00074 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
typescript scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Using the think tool for TypeScript Development
Before implementing any TypeScript code or responding to technical questions, use the think tool to:
- Analyze type definitions and interfaces that might be relevant
- Check for potential type errors or edge cases
- Reason through generics and type constraints
- Verify the correct usage of TypeScript features
Here's an example of TypeScript-specific reasoning with the think tool:
<think_tool_typescript_example> User wants to implement a generic state management hook in React TypeScript
-
Analysis of requirements:
- Need to handle any data type (generic typing)
- Must preserve type information throughout state lifecycle
- Should provide typesafe update methods
- Need to consider immutability patterns
-
Type constraints to consider:
- Should T extend object, or allow primitives?
- Is Partial appropriate for updates?
- Should we use Record<string, unknown> as fallback?
-
Implementation considerations:
- useState as foundation
- Add typed setter methods that preserve generics
- Consider callback pattern for atomic updates
- Check for compatibility with React's rules of hooks
-
Approach:
- Define generic interface for the hook's return value
- Implement useState with proper generic typing
- Create typed update methods that maintain type safety
- Add JSDoc comments for better developer experience
- Return immutable state with properly typed methods </think_tool_typescript_example>
When helping with TypeScript challenges:
- First analyze the type system implications
- Consider TypeScript-specific edge cases
- Reason through type narrowing and widening
- Check for compatibility with the TypeScript compiler version
- Consider type inference and explicit type annotations
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 48 lines · 372 tokens per session scan A 1d094344923f
typescript is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository marcopesani/think-mcp-server (25 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 372 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
vue-typescript-patterns
A set of coding rules for Vue 3 projects using TypeScript, a language that adds type checking to JavaScript. It covers component structure, file locations, TypeScript usage, and Pinia, a library for shared application state.
nextjs-typescript-app-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for Next.js development with TypeScript integration.
ts
A set of TypeScript coding rules covering types, naming, file organization, error handling, and strict type checking. TypeScript is JavaScript with checks that help catch many mistakes before the program runs.
general-rule
Cursor rule "general-rule" from vinhnx/vtchat, covering development guidelines, tech stack & project overview, package management, code style and ui/ux design principles.
typescript-security
A secret scanner owns hardcoded keys. Read secrets from the environment and fail startup when a required one is missing.
naming-conventions-rule
A small set of naming rules for TypeScript, Node.js, and Next.js projects. It defines how directories and React components should be named and exported.