Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/marker-io/mcp-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/marker-io/mcp-skills/marker-bug-to-fix)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/marker-io/mcp-skills/marker-bug-to-fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/marker-io/mcp-skills/marker-bug-to-fix/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/marker-io/mcp-skills/marker-bug-to-fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/marker-io/mcp-skills/marker-bug-to-fix.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.00936 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00468 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00187 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00094 |
Grade A, and why
marker-bug-to-fix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 65 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
marker-bug-to-fix
Take a single Marker.io issue and turn it into a ready-to-review code change in the current repo. Cuts the report-to-fix round-trip from a manual context hunt to a minimal diff in minutes.
When to use
The user points at one Marker.io issue and wants it fixed or root-caused in this codebase: "fix marker
issue <id>", "what's causing this bug", "investigate <marker link>". For triaging many issues at
once, use marker-triage.
Steps
- Load the issue:
issue_get(full) andissue_get_context(browser/OS/screen + console + network summaries). Read the reporter's description and the page URL. - Pull the evidence that localizes the bug:
issue_get_screenshotfor the visual state, the failingissue_get_console_log(logIndex)entries (stack traces), the failing/slowissue_get_network_request(requestIndex)(status, payload, response), andissue_get_attachmentsif any. - Map signals to code: from the URL/route, error messages, stack frames, and failing endpoints, use Grep/Glob/Read to find the responsible component, handler, or query in the working repo.
- State the root cause in one or two sentences. If you cannot localize it, say what extra info is
needed (and consider posting a gated
comment_createasking the reporter). - Propose a minimal fix as a diff. Prefer the smallest change that addresses the root cause. Show it for review before changing files.
- Verify with the project's own tooling: hand off to the
/verifyskill, or run the relevant test, to confirm the fix behaves. - Open the PR via the
/prskill.
Marker writes (gated)
Propose, then apply after confirmation:
- Set the issue to an in-progress status (
issue_update_status, using a status discovered viaproject_get). - Post a root-cause + fix summary as a
comment_create(link the PR). Keep itMember-onlyunless the reporter should see it.
Operating rules
This skill drives the Marker.io MCP. Read tools: projects_list, project_get, project_list_users,
list_issue_types, issues_list, issue_get, issue_get_context, issue_get_screenshot,
issue_get_attachments, issue_get_console_log, issue_get_network_request. Write tools:
issue_update_status, issue_update_assignee, issue_update_priority, issue_update_type,
comment_create.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 65 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A 147928fe2157
marker-bug-to-fix is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository marker-io/mcp-skills (7 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 936 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
api
USE WHEN: Defining HTTP requests, endpoints, and handling API responses.
ui-components
USE WHEN: Building UI components, structuring layouts, and applying styles using Tailwind CSS.
tanstack-query
USE WHEN: Managing server state, fetching data, and handling mutations with TanStack Query.
forms
USE WHEN: Constructing forms, validating inputs, and managing form state with Zod schemas.
react-best-practices
USE WHEN: Designing React components, implementing hooks, and managing component lifecycles.
state-management
USE WHEN: Managing global client state with Zustand and handling client-side state logic.