Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/markmhendrickson/foundationWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/markmhendrickson/foundation/agent_test_execution)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/markmhendrickson/foundation/agent_test_execution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/markmhendrickson/foundation/agent_test_execution/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/markmhendrickson/foundation/agent_test_execution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/markmhendrickson/foundation/agent_test_execution.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.02343 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00937 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00469 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00234 |
Grade A, and why
agent_test_execution scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 356 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent Test Execution Rules
Reference: Testing standards documentation (repository-specific)
Purpose
Ensures agents automatically run tests after implementing code changes and fix any failures before proceeding. This prevents bugs from being discovered only during manual testing.
Scope
This document covers:
- Mandatory test execution after code changes
- Test execution commands and workflows
- Failure handling and remediation
- Test result verification
This document does NOT cover:
- Test quality standards (see repository test quality rules)
- Test writing patterns (see repository testing standards)
- Test-first workflow (see
test_first_workflow.mdc)
Trigger Patterns
Agents MUST run tests immediately after:
- Implementing new features or functions
- Modifying existing code
- Adding or updating tests
- Changing database schemas or migrations
- Updating API endpoints or contracts
- Modifying UI components
- Before marking any implementation as complete
Mandatory Test Execution
Step 1: Run Relevant Test Suite
After ANY code change, agents MUST run the appropriate test suite:
For backend/domain changes:
# Type check first
npm run type-check
# Run unit tests
npm test
# Run integration tests
npm run test:integration
For frontend/UI changes:
# Type check
npm run type-check
# Run unit tests
npm test
# Run E2E tests (Playwright)
npm run test:e2e
For database/schema changes:
# Run migrations
npm run migrate
# Run integration tests (includes DB operations)
npm run test:integration
# Check schema advisors (if available)
npm run check:advisors
For all changes:
# Lint check
npm run lint
Step 2: Verify Test Results
After running tests, agents MUST:
- Check exit codes: All test commands must exit with code 0
- Review test output: Verify all tests passed (not just "some tests passed")
- Check coverage: Verify coverage meets requirements (if coverage check is enabled)
- Review failures: If any tests fail, identify root cause
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 356 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 9cd13c7aac24
agent_test_execution is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository markmhendrickson/foundation (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 2,343 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.
config-validation-and-normalization
Config validation and normalization responsibilities (defineConfig normalizes, the orm section schema validates and resolves paths, the loader reports per-section diagnostics).
control-plane-descriptors
Control plane descriptor and instance implementation patterns.