Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/markmhendrickson/foundation/bug_fix_detectiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/markmhendrickson/foundationWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00027 | $0.01130 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00565 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00226 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00113 |
Grade A, and why
bug_fix_detection scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 143 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Bug Fix Detection Rule
Reference: Skill fix-feature-bug — Bug fix workflow (.cursor/skills/fix-feature-bug/SKILL.md or foundation/agent_instructions/cursor_skills/fix-feature-bug/SKILL.md)
Configuration is read from foundation-config.yaml.
Trigger Patterns
When a user mentions any of the following patterns, automatically detect bug fix intent:
- "bug"
- "error"
- "fix"
- "broken"
- "not working"
- "failing"
- "issue" (in context of problems)
- "problem" (in context of code/functionality)
- Error messages or stack traces
- Test failures
- "regression"
- "broken feature"
- "doesn't work"
Agent Actions
Step 1: Detection and Confirmation
If context suggests a bug (mentions "bug", "error", "fix", "broken", error messages, etc.):
-
Extract bug information from context:
- Error messages or stack traces (if provided)
- Feature/module ID (if mentioned or can be inferred from path/context)
- Description of the problem
- Steps to reproduce (if mentioned)
-
Identify affected feature/module:
- Check error messages for file paths
- Check context for feature mentions
- Check open files for feature references
- If cannot identify → ask user: "Which feature/module is affected? (identifier or 'unknown')"
-
Ask for confirmation:
I see you're reporting a bug. Should I fix this using the bug fix workflow? Feature/Module: {identifier} (or 'unknown' if not identified) (yes/no) -
Exception handling:
- If user says "no" → do not proceed with bug fix workflow
- If user says "just document it" → document the bug instead
Step 2: Execute Bug Fix Workflow
If user confirms (yes):
-
Load configuration:
- Read
foundation-config.yamlto get bug fix workflow settings - Check if error classification is configured
- Determine feature unit directory (if feature units enabled)
- Read
-
Load required documents:
- Skill
fix-feature-bug(.cursor/skills/fix-feature-bug/SKILL.mdorfoundation/agent_instructions/cursor_skills/fix-feature-bug/SKILL.md) - Repository navigation guide (if configured)
- Feature spec and manifest (if feature units enabled and identifier provided)
- Error classification documentation (if configured)
- Relevant subsystem/module docs (if configured)
- Skill
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 143 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A c71906ed271a
bug_fix_detection is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository markmhendrickson/foundation (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 1,130 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
typescript
Changes to these high-fan-out internals can affect every message, delta, element, or rerun. Keep work in them minimal, and benchmark changes with representative stress-test apps.
coolify-ai-docs
Master reference to all Coolify AI documentation in .ai/ directory.
python_lib
Tips and guidelines specific to the development of the Streamlit Python library, not applicable to scripts and e2e tests.
specs
This directory contains product and tech specs for Streamlit features.