Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/markmhendrickson/foundationWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/markmhendrickson/foundation/bug_fix_detection)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/markmhendrickson/foundation/bug_fix_detection"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/markmhendrickson/foundation/bug_fix_detection/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/markmhendrickson/foundation/bug_fix_detection"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/markmhendrickson/foundation/bug_fix_detection.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.01130 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00452 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00226 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00113 |
Grade A, and why
bug_fix_detection scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 143 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Bug Fix Detection Rule
Reference: Skill fix-feature-bug — Bug fix workflow (.cursor/skills/fix-feature-bug/SKILL.md or foundation/agent_instructions/cursor_skills/fix-feature-bug/SKILL.md)
Configuration is read from foundation-config.yaml.
Trigger Patterns
When a user mentions any of the following patterns, automatically detect bug fix intent:
- "bug"
- "error"
- "fix"
- "broken"
- "not working"
- "failing"
- "issue" (in context of problems)
- "problem" (in context of code/functionality)
- Error messages or stack traces
- Test failures
- "regression"
- "broken feature"
- "doesn't work"
Agent Actions
Step 1: Detection and Confirmation
If context suggests a bug (mentions "bug", "error", "fix", "broken", error messages, etc.):
-
Extract bug information from context:
- Error messages or stack traces (if provided)
- Feature/module ID (if mentioned or can be inferred from path/context)
- Description of the problem
- Steps to reproduce (if mentioned)
-
Identify affected feature/module:
- Check error messages for file paths
- Check context for feature mentions
- Check open files for feature references
- If cannot identify → ask user: "Which feature/module is affected? (identifier or 'unknown')"
-
Ask for confirmation:
I see you're reporting a bug. Should I fix this using the bug fix workflow? Feature/Module: {identifier} (or 'unknown' if not identified) (yes/no) -
Exception handling:
- If user says "no" → do not proceed with bug fix workflow
- If user says "just document it" → document the bug instead
Step 2: Execute Bug Fix Workflow
If user confirms (yes):
-
Load configuration:
- Read
foundation-config.yamlto get bug fix workflow settings - Check if error classification is configured
- Determine feature unit directory (if feature units enabled)
- Read
-
Load required documents:
- Skill
fix-feature-bug(.cursor/skills/fix-feature-bug/SKILL.mdorfoundation/agent_instructions/cursor_skills/fix-feature-bug/SKILL.md) - Repository navigation guide (if configured)
- Feature spec and manifest (if feature units enabled and identifier provided)
- Error classification documentation (if configured)
- Relevant subsystem/module docs (if configured)
- Skill
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 143 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A c71906ed271a
bug_fix_detection is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository markmhendrickson/foundation (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 1,130 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
error-handling-and-validation
A code-quality guide for handling errors, invalid inputs, edge cases, preconditions, logging, and user-friendly error messages.
css-render-blocking-diagnosis
Cursor rule "css-render-blocking-diagnosis" from adobecom/da-express-milo, covering css render-blocking diagnosis & resolution, critical learning from 98 pagespeed achievement, primary diagnostic protocol, step 1: css blocking symptom recognition and step 2: css loading sequence audit.
modus-checkbox-value-inversion-react-short
Critical bug fix for ModusWcCheckbox value property inversion.
javascript-expert-performance
Profile first. Measure before and after. Never optimize without data.
kiss-ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
5-bug-finder
APPLY WHEN investigating a bug.