Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/matank001/cursor-security-rules/secure-dev-javagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/matank001/cursor-security-rulesWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00975 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00487 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00195 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00097 |
Grade A, and why
secure-dev-java scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 90 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Secure Java Development
These rules apply to all Java code in the repository (including Spring, Jakarta EE, and standalone apps) and aim to prevent common security risks through disciplined use of input validation, safe APIs, and secure coding patterns.
All violations must include a clear explanation of which rule was triggered and why, to help developers understand and fix the issue effectively.
Generated code must not violate these rules. If a rule is violated, a comment must be added explaining the issue and suggesting a correction.
1. Avoid Insecure Deserialization
- Rule: Never deserialize untrusted data using
ObjectInputStream,readObject(), or similar APIs. Use safe serialization formats (e.g., JSON, protobuf) and validate all input before deserialization. - Unsafe:
ObjectInputStream ois = new ObjectInputStream(inputStream); Object obj = ois.readObject(); // Untrusted input ➜ RCE risk - Safe:
// Use a safe format and strict schema validation MyObject obj = objectMapper.readValue(jsonInput, MyObject.class);
2. Use Parameterized Queries for Database Access
- Rule: Never build SQL queries by concatenating user input. Use
PreparedStatementor ORM parameterization.
3. Always Use Prepared Statements for SQL
- Rule: Always use
PreparedStatementfor SQL queries, never concatenate or interpolate user input into SQL strings. Prepared statements ensure user input is treated as data, not code, and are the most effective way to prevent SQL injection. - Unsafe:
String query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = '" + userInput + "'"; Statement stmt = conn.createStatement(); ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery(query); - Safe:
String query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = ?"; PreparedStatement pstmt = conn.prepareStatement(query); pstmt.setString(1, userInput); ResultSet rs = pstmt.executeQuery();
4. Prevent Command Injection
- Rule: Never pass user input directly to
Runtime.exec(),ProcessBuilder, or similar APIs. Use allow-lists, parameterization, and safe wrappers. Avoid shell invocation unless absolutely necessary. - Unsafe:
Runtime.getRuntime().exec("ls " + userInput); // Command injection risk - Safe:
// Use ProcessBuilder with static arguments or validated input ProcessBuilder pb = new ProcessBuilder("ls", validatedArg); pb.start();
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 90 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A f66ac89719eb
secure-dev-java is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository matank001/cursor-security-rules (379 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 975 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
ankra-cli
Ankra CLI rules and best practices for managing Kubernetes clusters via the Ankra platform.
go-backend-scalability-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for Go development with backend scalability.
cloudflare-email-telegram-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for setting up email-to-Telegram forwarding via Cloudflare Email Routing and Workers using the mail2tg CLI.
flutter-riverpod-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for Flutter Riverpod.
angular-novo-elements-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for Angular development with Novo Elements UI library.
automl-hyperparameter-optimization
AutoML and hyperparameter optimization rules for Python ML projects using Ray Tune, Optuna, PyCaret, and time-series AutoML libraries.