secure-dev-java

A set of rules for writing Java code safely, including Spring, Jakarta EE, and standalone applications. It covers practices such as validating input, avoiding unsafe object deserialization, and using parameterized database queries.

In plain words
What is it for?
Guiding code generation and review across Java repositories. It applies to handling untrusted data and database access, including avoiding ObjectInputStream and SQL string concatenation.
Why use it?
It helps prevent common security problems, such as running attacker-controlled code or altering database queries through user input. Violations must include an explanation and a suggested correction.

Cursor rule

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/matank001/cursor-security-rules/secure-dev-java
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/matank001/cursor-security-rules
Per session 0 Nothing until a file matches its globs; then the whole rule loads.
When invoked 975 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.00975
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00487
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00195
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00097

Measured yesterday against content hash f66ac89719eb, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

secure-dev-java scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

secure-dev-java.mdc · 90 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 90 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Secure Java Development

These rules apply to all Java code in the repository (including Spring, Jakarta EE, and standalone apps) and aim to prevent common security risks through disciplined use of input validation, safe APIs, and secure coding patterns.

All violations must include a clear explanation of which rule was triggered and why, to help developers understand and fix the issue effectively.
Generated code must not violate these rules. If a rule is violated, a comment must be added explaining the issue and suggesting a correction.

1. Avoid Insecure Deserialization

  • Rule: Never deserialize untrusted data using ObjectInputStream, readObject(), or similar APIs. Use safe serialization formats (e.g., JSON, protobuf) and validate all input before deserialization.
  • Unsafe:
    ObjectInputStream ois = new ObjectInputStream(inputStream);
    Object obj = ois.readObject(); // Untrusted input ➜ RCE risk
    
  • Safe:
    // Use a safe format and strict schema validation
    MyObject obj = objectMapper.readValue(jsonInput, MyObject.class);
    

2. Use Parameterized Queries for Database Access

  • Rule: Never build SQL queries by concatenating user input. Use PreparedStatement or ORM parameterization.

3. Always Use Prepared Statements for SQL

  • Rule: Always use PreparedStatement for SQL queries, never concatenate or interpolate user input into SQL strings. Prepared statements ensure user input is treated as data, not code, and are the most effective way to prevent SQL injection.
  • Unsafe:
    String query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = '" + userInput + "'";
    Statement stmt = conn.createStatement();
    ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery(query);
    
  • Safe:
    String query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = ?";
    PreparedStatement pstmt = conn.prepareStatement(query);
    pstmt.setString(1, userInput);
    ResultSet rs = pstmt.executeQuery();
    

4. Prevent Command Injection

  • Rule: Never pass user input directly to Runtime.exec(), ProcessBuilder, or similar APIs. Use allow-lists, parameterization, and safe wrappers. Avoid shell invocation unless absolutely necessary.
  • Unsafe:
    Runtime.getRuntime().exec("ls " + userInput); // Command injection risk
    
  • Safe:
    // Use ProcessBuilder with static arguments or validated input
    ProcessBuilder pb = new ProcessBuilder("ls", validatedArg);
    pb.start();
    

Read the full file on GitHub · 90 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 90 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A f66ac89719eb

Subscribe to this mod's changes

secure-dev-java is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository matank001/cursor-security-rules (379 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 975 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.