security-critical

Security rules for Payload CMS, a system for building content-managed applications. They describe access-control settings and transaction-safe operations in server-side hooks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Securing Payload CMS API calls, enforcing user permissions, handling trusted administrative actions, and preserving transaction safety in hooks.
Why use it?
They help prevent permission checks from being skipped and avoid data corruption when related operations run together.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/memodb-io/acontext/security-critical
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/memodb-io/Acontext

Made for: Cursor.

Per session 9 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 727 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00009 $0.00727
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.00364
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00145
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00073

Measured 2d ago against content hash 43f9c5b15ad1, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

security-critical scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

landingpage/.cursor/rules/security-critical.mdc · 123 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 123 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

CRITICAL SECURITY PATTERNS

These are the three most critical security patterns that MUST be followed in every Payload CMS project.

1. Local API Access Control (MOST IMPORTANT)

By default, Local API operations bypass ALL access control, even when passing a user.

// ❌ SECURITY BUG: Passes user but ignores their permissions
await payload.find({
  collection: 'posts',
  user: someUser, // Access control is BYPASSED!
})

// ✅ SECURE: Actually enforces the user's permissions
await payload.find({
  collection: 'posts',
  user: someUser,
  overrideAccess: false, // REQUIRED for access control
})

// ✅ Administrative operation (intentional bypass)
await payload.find({
  collection: 'posts',
  // No user, overrideAccess defaults to true
})

When to use each:

  • overrideAccess: true (default) - Server-side operations you trust (cron jobs, system tasks)
  • overrideAccess: false - When operating on behalf of a user (API routes, webhooks)

Rule: When passing user to Local API, ALWAYS set overrideAccess: false

2. Transaction Safety in Hooks

Nested operations in hooks without req break transaction atomicity.

// ❌ DATA CORRUPTION RISK: Separate transaction
hooks: {
  afterChange: [
    async ({ doc, req }) => {
      await req.payload.create({
        collection: 'audit-log',
        data: { docId: doc.id },
        // Missing req - runs in separate transaction!
      })
    },
  ]
}

// ✅ ATOMIC: Same transaction
hooks: {
  afterChange: [
    async ({ doc, req }) => {
      await req.payload.create({
        collection: 'audit-log',
        data: { docId: doc.id },
        req, // Maintains atomicity
      })
    },
  ]
}

Why This Matters:

  • MongoDB (with replica sets): Creates atomic session across operations
  • PostgreSQL: All operations use same Drizzle transaction
  • SQLite (with transactions enabled): Ensures rollback on errors
  • Without req: Each operation runs independently, breaking atomicity

Read the full file on GitHub · 123 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 123 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A 43f9c5b15ad1

Subscribe to this mod's changes

security-critical is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository memodb-io/Acontext (3,679 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 727 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.