Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/mhaggis/security-detections-mcp/linux-testing-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MHaggis/Security-Detections-MCPWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/mhaggis/security-detections-mcp/linux-testing-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/mhaggis/security-detections-mcp/linux-testing-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/mhaggis/security-detections-mcp/linux-testing-workflow.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00940 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00470 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00188 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00094 |
Grade B, and why
linux-testing-workflow scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Asks for rootmediumPrivilege escalation
A mod that escalates privileges can change anything on the machine, not only the project.
sudo journalctl -u sysmon --since "5 minutes ago" | head -50 The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 121 lines · 0 tokens per session scan B 5f3ceb9aa160
linux-testing-workflow is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository MHaggis/Security-Detections-MCP (481 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 940 tokens. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (asks for root). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
langchain-workflow-provider-agnostic
Langchain workflow changes must work regardless of model/provider choice.
agent-config-test-confirmation
Require explicit user approval before running or creating tests that mutate active agent configs.
ui-designer
UI designer rules — theme variables, color usage, no literal hex in app code.
fail-closed-verification
Fail-closed verification protocol — direct validation required; no speculation; mutable data/config protected.
pytest-run-tests-integration
All pytest tests for ongoing use must be runnable via runtests.py.
python-package-safety
Use safety-mcp for Python package security and version selection.