Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/micsapp/micstec-skills/accessibility-guidelinesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/micsapp/micstec-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/micsapp/micstec-skills/accessibility-guidelines)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/micsapp/micstec-skills/accessibility-guidelines"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/micsapp/micstec-skills/accessibility-guidelines.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00402 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00201 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00080 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
accessibility-guidelines scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 29 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 91935a4b1b37
accessibility-guidelines is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository micsapp/micstec-skills (4 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), with no licence file. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 402 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
cursorrules
When the user asks about llm compliance comparison, use llm-compliance-comparison-mcp tools: compareproviders, recommendforusecase, providerriskprofile, compliancematrix, crosswalkproviders.
accessibility-guidelines
Accessibility guidelines for Angular + TypeScript applications to ensure inclusive design and compliance with WCAG standards.
supreme-ai-governance
First-in-the-world AI governance and compliance discipline for AI Governance Officers, Compliance Leads, Risk Managers, DPOs, Legal Counsel, CISOs, and AI and ML and LLM engineers and architects. Operationalizes ISO/IEC 42001:2023 (AI Management System clauses 4 to 10, roughly 38 Annex A controls across 9 objectives…
prompt-review-quality
This prompt provides comprehensive quality assessment for existing prompts, measuring compliance with established standards and offering specific improvement recommendations.
ai-ethics-advisor-intelligent
Apply this rule when working on AI/ML systems requiring ethical review, bias assessment, fairness evaluation, regulatory compliance (EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF), or responsible AI implementation. Essential for projects involving high-risk AI decisions, demographic data processing, algorithmic fairness, or when…
executing-red-team-engagement-planning
Red team engagement planning is the foundational phase that defines scope, objectives, rules of engagement (ROE), threat model selection, and operational timelines before any offensive testing begins.