Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mitas/cursor-rulesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/mitas/cursor-rules/database)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/mitas/cursor-rules/database"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/mitas/cursor-rules/database/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/mitas/cursor-rules/database"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/mitas/cursor-rules/database.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00406 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00162 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00081 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
database scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to database — 7 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Database Best Practices
Prisma Setup
- Use proper schema design
- Implement proper migrations
- Use proper relation definitions
- Configure proper connection
- Implement proper seeding
- Use proper client setup
Prisma Models
- Use proper model naming
- Implement proper relations
- Use proper field types
- Define proper indexes
- Implement proper constraints
- Use proper enums
Prisma Queries
- Use proper query optimization
- Implement proper filtering
- Use proper relations loading
- Handle transactions properly
- Implement proper pagination
- Use proper aggregations
Supabase Setup
- Configure proper project setup
- Implement proper authentication
- Use proper database setup
- Configure proper storage
- Implement proper policies
- Use proper client setup
Supabase Security
- Implement proper RLS policies
- Use proper authentication
- Configure proper permissions
- Handle sensitive data properly
- Implement proper backups
- Use proper encryption
Supabase Queries
- Use proper query optimization
- Implement proper filtering
- Use proper joins
- Handle real-time properly
- Implement proper pagination
- Use proper functions
Database Design
- Use proper normalization
- Implement proper indexing
- Use proper constraints
- Define proper relations
- Implement proper cascades
- Use proper data types
Performance
- Use proper connection pooling
- Implement proper caching
- Use proper query optimization
- Handle N+1 queries properly
- Implement proper batching
- Monitor performance metrics
Security
- Use proper authentication
- Implement proper authorization
- Handle sensitive data properly
- Use proper encryption
- Implement proper backups
- Monitor security issues
Best Practices
- Follow database conventions
- Use proper migrations
- Implement proper versioning
- Handle errors properly
- Document schema properly
- Monitor database health
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 86 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A a569f9a311b1
database is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository mitas/cursor-rules (2 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 406 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to database, differing in 7 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
as-contract-cast-smell
// ❌ WRONG — bypasses the family ContractSerializer seam const contract = JSON.parse(raw) as Contract; const contract = JSON.parse(raw) as Contract .
no-backward-compatibility
Do not add backward-compatibility shims or migration scaffolding.
postgresql
This guide defines the definitive best practices for writing clean, performant, and maintainable PostgreSQL SQL, focusing on modern conventions and avoiding common pitfalls.
ehs-ims-conventions
EHS IMS app — RBAC, data layer, tRPC, migrations, AI boundaries.
sync-timedb-archive-janitor-contract
Day-close / cold-path worker contracts for synctimedb (A invariants; B tick coordinator retired).
schema
Scalable and secure schema design patterns for relational databases, NoSQL, and APIs. / TR: İlişkisel veri tabanları, NoSQL ve API'ler için ölçeklenebilir ve güvenli şema tasarım kalıpları.