Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/miyatti777/cursor_agent_rules_sampleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/miyatti777/cursor_agent_rules_sample/dinner_execution)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/miyatti777/cursor_agent_rules_sample/dinner_execution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/miyatti777/cursor_agent_rules_sample/dinner_execution/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/miyatti777/cursor_agent_rules_sample/dinner_execution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/miyatti777/cursor_agent_rules_sample/dinner_execution.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.04282 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.01713 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00856 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00428 |
Grade A, and why
dinner_execution scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 487 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
夕食実行ルール - 買い物・調理・片付け・振り返りフェーズ
description: "夕食の準備の実行フェーズに関するルール（買い物・調理・片付け・振り返り）"
1. 夕食の買い物 - 買い物管理フェーズ
trigger: "夕食の買い物" steps: - name: "load_project_path" action: "execute_shell" command: "cat .dinner_project_path" variable: "dinner_dir" message: "プロジェクトパスを読み込んでいます..."
- name: "load_variables"
action: "execute_shell"
command: "grep shopping_budget {{dinner_dir}}/shopping_list.md | cut -d':' -f2 | tr -d ' 円'"
variable: "shopping_budget"
message: "予算情報を読み込んでいます..."
- name: "manage_shopping"
action: "call shopping_manager"
params:
shopping_list_path: "{{dinner_dir}}/shopping_list.md"
budget: "{{shopping_budget}}"
message: "買い物リストの管理を開始します。予算内で必要な食材を揃えましょう。"
- name: "record_shopping_time"
action: "execute_shell"
command: "date +%H:%M"
variable: "shopping_end_time"
message: "買い物完了時刻: {{shopping_end_time}}"
- name: "update_shopping_status"
action: "append_to_file"
path: "{{dinner_dir}}/shopping_list.md"
template: "shopping_status_template"
message: "買い物ステータスを記録しました"
- name: "shopping_complete"
action: "confirm"
message: "買い物が完了しました。次は「夕食の調理」と話しかけて調理フェーズに進んでください。"
2. 夕食の調理 - 調理プロセスフェーズ
trigger: "夕食の調理" steps: - name: "load_project_path" action: "execute_shell" command: "cat .dinner_project_path" variable: "dinner_dir" message: "プロジェクトパスを読み込んでいます..."
- name: "load_cooking_method"
action: "read_file"
path: "{{dinner_dir}}/recipe.md"
variable: "recipe_content"
message: "レシピ情報を読み込んでいます..."
- name: "ingredient_preparation"
action: "call"
target: "cooking_preparation"
params:
recipe_path: "{{dinner_dir}}/recipe.md"
tasks_path: "{{dinner_dir}}/tasks.md"
message: "材料の下準備を開始します。"
- name: "setup_cooking_timer"
action: "execute_shell"
command: "date +%s"
variable: "cooking_start_timestamp"
message: "調理開始時間を記録しています..."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 487 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A d89ffd44523a
dinner_execution is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository miyatti777/cursor_agent_rules_sample (3 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 4,282 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
explorer-interface-brief
Use when asked to design the interface for an interactive 3D explorer, plan a UI for exploring a 3D model of a topic, or write an image-model prompt for a 3D learning app mock-up. Produces, from a topic, the UI design brief (audience, layout, panels, interactions, label style, colour palette, accessibility) and an…
reflection-basic
Basic reflection format for Level 2 Simple Enhancement tasks.
simplicity
Simplicity - smallest correct diff; reuse, platform, installed deps before new code; no speculative abstraction.
git-workflow
Rules for git operations, commit strategy, and GitHub CLI usage.
feedback-enhanced
Rules for an interactive feedback system that lets users and an AI agent discuss complex development work in real time. It includes guidance for recording decisions, tracking progress and handling detailed inputs such as code and diagrams.
kiss-ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.