plan-mode-map

plan-mode-map is a cursor rule for Cursor from moclam1905/CocktailRecipes. It costs 2,470 tokens per session, scanned A, a copy of plan-mode-map, MIT.

A planning workflow that creates implementation plans based on task complexity and validates the required technology before coding.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for reviewing code structure, documenting planned changes, identifying challenges, updating task records, and validating technology choices.
Why use it?
It turns a task into documented changes, challenges, and checklists, reducing uncertainty during implementation.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/moclam1905/cocktailrecipes/plan-mode-map
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/moclam1905/CocktailRecipes

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for plan-mode-map

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/moclam1905/cocktailrecipes/plan-mode-map.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/moclam1905/cocktailrecipes/plan-mode-map)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/moclam1905/cocktailrecipes/plan-mode-map"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/moclam1905/cocktailrecipes/plan-mode-map.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 2,470 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 2,470 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 94% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.02470 $0.02470
Opus 5 $0.01235 $0.01235
Sonnet 5 $0.00494 $0.00494
Haiku 4.5 $0.00247 $0.00247

Measured 4d ago against content hash 67fab4560baa, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

plan-mode-map scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

94% identical to plan-mode-map — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.cursor/rules/isolation_rules/visual-maps/plan-mode-map.mdc · 269 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 269 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

PLAN MODE: TASK PLANNING PROCESS MAP

TL;DR: This visual map guides the PLAN mode process, focusing on creating detailed implementation plans based on the complexity level determined during initialization, with mandatory technology validation before implementation.

🧭 PLAN MODE PROCESS FLOW

graph TD
    Start["START PLANNING"] --> ReadTasks["Read tasks.md<br>Core/task-tracking.md"]
    
    %% Complexity Level Determination
    ReadTasks --> CheckLevel{"Determine<br>Complexity Level"}
    CheckLevel -->|"Level 2"| Level2["LEVEL 2 PLANNING<br>Level2/enhancement-planning.md"]
    CheckLevel -->|"Level 3"| Level3["LEVEL 3 PLANNING<br>Level3/feature-planning.md"]
    CheckLevel -->|"Level 4"| Level4["LEVEL 4 PLANNING<br>Level4/system-planning.md"]
    
    %% Level 2 Planning
    Level2 --> L2Review["Review Code<br>Structure"]
    L2Review --> L2Document["Document<br>Planned Changes"]
    L2Document --> L2Challenges["Identify<br>Challenges"]
    L2Challenges --> L2Checklist["Create Task<br>Checklist"]
    L2Checklist --> L2Update["Update tasks.md<br>with Plan"]
    L2Update --> L2Tech["TECHNOLOGY<br>VALIDATION"]
    L2Tech --> L2Verify["Verify Plan<br>Completeness"]
    
    %% Level 3 Planning
    Level3 --> L3Review["Review Codebase<br>Structure"]
    L3Review --> L3Requirements["Document Detailed<br>Requirements"]
    L3Requirements --> L3Components["Identify Affected<br>Components"]
    L3Components --> L3Plan["Create Comprehensive<br>Implementation Plan"]
    L3Plan --> L3Challenges["Document Challenges<br>& Solutions"]
    L3Challenges --> L3Update["Update tasks.md<br>with Plan"]
    L3Update --> L3Tech["TECHNOLOGY<br>VALIDATION"]
    L3Tech --> L3Flag["Flag Components<br>Requiring Creative"]
    L3Flag --> L3Verify["Verify Plan<br>Completeness"]
    
    %% Level 4 Planning
    Level4 --> L4Analysis["Codebase Structure<br>Analysis"]
    L4Analysis --> L4Requirements["Document Comprehensive<br>Requirements"]
    L4Requirements --> L4Diagrams["Create Architectural<br>Diagrams"]
    L4Diagrams --> L4Subsystems["Identify Affected<br>Subsystems"]
    L4Subsystems --> L4Dependencies["Document Dependencies<br>& Integration Points"]
    L4Dependencies --> L4Plan["Create Phased<br>Implementation Plan"]
    L4Plan --> L4Update["Update tasks.md<br>with Plan"]
    L4Update --> L4Tech["TECHNOLOGY<br>VALIDATION"]
    L4Tech --> L4Flag["Flag Components<br>Requiring Creative"]
    L4Flag --> L4Verify["Verify Plan<br>Completeness"]
    
    %% Technology Validation Gate - NEW
    L2Tech & L3Tech & L4Tech --> TechGate["⛔ TECHNOLOGY<br>VALIDATION GATE"]
    TechGate --> TechSelection["Document Technology<br>Stack Selection"]
    TechSelection --> TechHelloWorld["Create Hello World<br>Proof of Concept"]
    TechHelloWorld --> TechDependencies["Verify Required<br>Dependencies"]
    TechDependencies --> TechConfig["Validate Build<br>Configuration"]
    TechConfig --> TechBuild["Complete Test<br>Build"]
    TechBuild --> TechVerify["⛔ TECHNOLOGY<br>CHECKPOINT"]
    
    %% Verification & Completion
    L2Verify & L3Verify & L4Verify & TechVerify --> CheckCreative{"Creative<br>Phases<br>Required?"}
    
    %% Mode Transition
    CheckCreative -->|"Yes"| RecCreative["NEXT MODE:<br>CREATIVE MODE"]
    CheckCreative -->|"No"| RecImplement["NEXT MODE:<br>IMPLEMENT MODE"]
    
    %% Style for Technology Gate
    style TechGate fill:#ff5555,stroke:#dd3333,color:white,stroke-width:3px
    style TechVerify fill:#ff5555,stroke:#dd3333,color:white,stroke-width:3px
    style TechSelection fill:#4da6ff,stroke:#0066cc,color:white
    style TechHelloWorld fill:#4da6ff,stroke:#0066cc,color:white
    style TechDependencies fill:#4da6ff,stroke:#0066cc,color:white
    style TechConfig fill:#4da6ff,stroke:#0066cc,color:white
    style TechBuild fill:#4da6ff,stroke:#0066cc,color:white

Read the full file on GitHub · 269 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 269 lines · 2,470 tokens per session scan A 67fab4560baa

Subscribe to this mod's changes

plan-mode-map is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository moclam1905/CocktailRecipes (1 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It adds 2,470 tokens to every session, about $0.0123 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to plan-mode-map, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other cursor rules, from other repositories

android-project

Core behavior rules for AI agents working on this Android project.

JoDaBaRo/agentic-mobile-rules · 8,084 tokens

ios-project-bootstrap

Walks a developer through bootstrapping a BRAND-NEW iOS project for agentic CLI delivery — Apple Developer Program enrollment, App Store Connect listing, provisioning profiles, Fastlane setup from scratch, Firebase App Distribution, TestFlight + App Store first upload. Use when the user says they're starting a new iOS…

JoDaBaRo/agentic-mobile-rules · 108 tokens

android-project-bootstrap

Walks a developer through bootstrapping a BRAND-NEW Android project for agentic CLI delivery — creating the Firebase project, registering the Android app, setting up App Distribution, creating the Google Play Console listing, wiring API access, and installing the Gradle plugins. Use when the user says they're starting…

JoDaBaRo/agentic-mobile-rules · 106 tokens

android-project-onboarding

Walks a new developer through one-time setup of an EXISTING configured Android project from a blank macOS install — JDK, Android SDK, AVD, scrcpy, shell env vars, credential files, and a smoke-test build. Assumes Firebase project + Play Console listing already exist; user just needs to acquire credentials. Use when…

JoDaBaRo/agentic-mobile-rules · 161 tokens

ios-project-onboarding

Walks a new developer through one-time setup of an EXISTING configured iOS project from a blank macOS install — Xcode, Fastlane, SPM dependencies, code signing, simulator, and a smoke-test build. Assumes App Store Connect + Firebase + Fastlane are already configured upstream; user just needs local toolchain +…

JoDaBaRo/agentic-mobile-rules · 182 tokens

ios-project

Core behavior rules for AI agents working on this iOS project.

JoDaBaRo/agentic-mobile-rules · 4,506 tokens