PM Skills is a collection of plain-Markdown instructions that teach AI assistants structured methods for handling professional, personal, and life-admin tasks. People use it with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor, Codex, and other supported agents for work such as writing product requirements, reviewing documents, or planning difficult situations.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/accommodation-request)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/accommodation-request"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/accommodation-request/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/accommodation-request"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/accommodation-request.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00114 | $0.01421 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00057 | $0.00711 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00284 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00142 |
Grade A, and why
accommodation-request scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 120 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Accommodation Request Skill
Reasonable accommodations (US: ADA; UK: reasonable adjustments under the Equality Act; similar elsewhere) are a right, but getting them often stalls on how the request is framed: people over-share medical detail, ask for a vague "help," or frame it as a favor rather than an adjustment to a barrier. Employers and institutions respond best to a specific request that names the barrier and the adjustment that removes it — they generally don't need your diagnosis, only the functional limitation and what helps. This skill writes that request, guides how much to disclose, and prepares you for the interactive back-and-forth that follows. It is not legal advice; it routes to the formal process and to advocacy if you hit resistance.
What This Skill Produces
- A barriers-and-adjustments map: for each thing that's hard, the specific workplace/course barrier and the concrete adjustment that removes it (framed as an adjustment to a barrier, not a personal favor)
- The request letter/email: to the right person (HR, disability services, manager per the process), citing the process, naming the adjustments, and inviting the interactive dialogue
- Disclosure guidance: how much to share (usually the functional limitation and what helps, not the diagnosis), what you're not obliged to reveal, and where medical documentation is genuinely needed
- A process plan: the interactive/good-faith dialogue that's expected, how to handle "that's not possible," alternatives, and escalation to advocacy or the formal complaint route if needed
Required Inputs
Ask for (if not already provided):
- The setting (workplace or education) and country/system, since the legal framework and process differ
- The specific difficulties and the tasks/situations where they bite (the barrier), and what adjustments would help
- What the user is comfortable disclosing and to whom, and whether there's an existing process (HR policy, disability services office)
- Any history (a prior refusal, a difficult manager) that shapes strategy
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 120 lines · 114 tokens per session scan A ab2395b0d91a
accommodation-request is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills (1,345 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 114 tokens to every session and 1,421 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
cursor
Always-on my-adhd-caveman. Off with "stop adhd-caveman" or "normal mode".
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
cli-error-handling
CLI command error handling patterns.
prefer-assertions-over-defensive-checks
Prefer assertions over defensive checks when data is guaranteed to be valid.