PM Skills is a collection of plain-Markdown instructions that teach AI assistants structured methods for handling professional, personal, and life-admin tasks. People use it with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor, Codex, and other supported agents for work such as writing product requirements, reviewing documents, or planning difficult situations.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/ai-agent-reliability)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/ai-agent-reliability"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/ai-agent-reliability/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/ai-agent-reliability"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/ai-agent-reliability.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00153 | $0.01152 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00077 | $0.00576 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00230 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00115 |
Grade A, and why
ai-agent-reliability scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 68 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
AI-Agent Reliability
An AI agent that works in a demo and one you can trust in production are different things — the gap is everything that happens when input is messy, the model hallucinates, a tool call goes wrong, or an error fails silently. This maps where your agent can fail and the specific checks that catch each, scaled to the stakes, plus a rollout that earns trust incrementally — so "works sometimes" becomes "works reliably."
What This Skill Produces
- A failure map — where this agent can go wrong: bad/unexpected input, hallucinated output, wrong or malformed tool calls, unhandled edge cases, silent failures, and runaway loops
- The catching checks per failure — input validation, output verification, evals on real cases, schema/format checks on tool calls, human-in-the-loop gates, and monitoring/alerts
- An eval approach — testing on a real set of cases (including the hard ones) so quality is measured, not assumed, and regressions are caught
- Human-in-the-loop placement — where a human must approve, scaled to consequence (irreversible/external actions gated, low-stakes automated)
- A right-sized plan — reliability effort matched to the stakes, not gold-plating a low-risk toy or under-testing a high-risk system
- A trust-building rollout — shadow mode → low-stakes → expand, with monitoring, rather than shipping it everywhere and hoping
Required Inputs
Ask for these if not provided:
- The agent — what it does, what tools/actions it takes, what it touches
- The stakes — what a failure costs (drives how hard to test and gate)
- Where it fails now — the flakiness you've seen (points at the weak spots)
- Your setup — the framework/tools, and whether you can add evals/monitoring
Framework: Map Failures, Catch Each, Earn Trust
- Enumerate the failure modes. Walk the agent's path — input, reasoning, tool calls, output, actions — and name where each step can break. You can't guard what you haven't named.
- Attach a check to each. Validation for input, verification for output, schema checks for tool calls, evals for quality, gates for consequential actions — a specific catch per failure.
- Build real evals. A set of representative and hard cases, scored — so you know it works and catch regressions before users do.
- Gate by consequence. Irreversible or external actions get a human check; low-stakes steps run free. Match the gate to the cost.
- Right-size it. Don't over-engineer a low-risk helper or under-test a system that moves money or data — effort follows stakes.
- Roll out to earn trust. Shadow mode, then low-stakes live, then expand — with monitoring and alerts — so reliability is proven, not assumed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 68 lines · 153 tokens per session scan A c7a0567c07da
ai-agent-reliability is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills (1,352 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 153 tokens to every session and 1,152 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
cli-error-handling
CLI command error handling patterns.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.
control-plane-descriptors
Control plane descriptor and instance implementation patterns.