ai-product-canvas

ai-product-canvas is a cursor rule for Cursor from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills. It costs 68 tokens per session (1,608 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A planning framework for AI and machine-learning products, including the user problem, model approach, data, evaluation, and responsible use. It treats an AI feature as a product decision, not just a technical project.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to define AI features, assess LLM integrations, plan data and model evaluation, and identify risks before building or deploying.
Why use it?
It helps prevent teams from adding AI without a clear user need, accuracy target, evaluation method, or fallback when the model is wrong.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Written for Cursor: a Cursor rule (.mdc).

Good fit Use it to define AI features, assess LLM integrations, plan data and model evaluation, and identify risks before building or deploying.

Compare 6 cursor rules from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/ai-product-canvas
About the project

PM Skills is a collection of plain-Markdown instructions that teach AI assistants structured methods for handling professional, personal, and life-admin tasks. People use it with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor, Codex, and other supported agents for work such as writing product requirements, reviewing documents, or planning difficult situations.

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · 1,357 stars · on GitHub · mohitagw15856.github.io

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for ai-product-canvas

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/ai-product-canvas/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/ai-product-canvas)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/ai-product-canvas"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/ai-product-canvas/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for ai-product-canvas

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/ai-product-canvas"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/ai-product-canvas.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 68 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,608 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00068 $0.01608
Opus 5 $0.00034 $0.00804
Sonnet 5 $0.00014 $0.00322
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00161

Measured 8d ago against content hash dd227890d717, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ai-product-canvas scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

exports/cursor/pm-advanced/ai-product-canvas/ai-product-canvas.mdc · 171 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 171 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

AI Product Canvas Skill

Define AI products with the same rigour as any product decision — but with additional layers for data, model, evaluation, and responsible AI. This canvas prevents the most common AI product failure: building a technically impressive feature that doesn't solve a real problem.

AI Product Anti-Patterns to Check First

Before building, flag if any of these apply:

  • ❌ "We should add AI to [existing feature]" — with no user problem defined
  • ❌ Accuracy target undefined before build begins
  • ❌ No plan for what happens when the model is wrong
  • ❌ User-facing AI output with no human review or fallback
  • ❌ Training data not audited for bias or quality
  • ❌ No evaluation metric — "we'll know it when we see it"

AI Product Canvas Output Format

AI Product Canvas — [Feature Name] — [Date]

PM Owner: [Name] ML/AI Lead: [Name] Status: Discovery / Design / Build / Evaluation / Live


1. Problem Definition

User problem being solved:

[What specific situation is the user in? What job are they trying to get done?]

Why AI?

[What makes this problem require AI vs a deterministic solution? If the answer is "because we can," stop here.]

Success for the user looks like:

[What outcome does the user experience when the AI feature is working well?]


2. AI Approach

Task type:

  • Classification
  • Generation (text, image, code)
  • Summarisation / extraction
  • Recommendation
  • Search / retrieval
  • Prediction / forecasting
  • Conversation / agent

Model approach:

  • LLM API (GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, etc.) — specify: [Model name + version]
  • Fine-tuned model on own data
  • Custom model trained from scratch
  • RAG (retrieval-augmented generation)
  • Embedding + vector search

Rationale for chosen approach: [Why this, not alternatives]


3. Data Requirements
Data Type Source Volume Quality Status Bias Risk
[Training data] [Where it comes from] [Volume] [Audit status] H/M/L
[Evaluation data] [Where it comes from] [Volume] [Audit status] H/M/L

Read the full file on GitHub · 171 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 171 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A dd227890d717

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ai-product-canvas is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills (1,357 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 1,608 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.