PM Skills is a collection of plain-Markdown instructions that teach AI assistants structured methods for handling professional, personal, and life-admin tasks. People use it with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor, Codex, and other supported agents for work such as writing product requirements, reviewing documents, or planning difficult situations.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/the-ick-decoder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/the-ick-decoder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/the-ick-decoder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/the-ick-decoder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/the-ick-decoder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00130 | $0.01587 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00065 | $0.00794 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00317 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00159 |
Grade A, and why
the-ick-decoder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 120 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
The Ick Decoder Skill
"The ick" — the sudden inexplicable repulsion toward someone you were into — is one of dating's great confusions, because it comes in three completely different flavors wearing the same costume. Sometimes it's your instincts correctly flagging a real incompatibility or red flag. Sometimes it's an anxious/avoidant self-sabotage pattern that manufactures a reason to flee anyone who gets close. And sometimes it's a superficial ick (he ran for the bus funny) that has nothing to do with anything. Most dating advice validates whichever one you want to hear. This skill instead interrogates the specific ick to tell which flavor it is — because dumping someone great over an avoidant spiral and ignoring a real red flag are opposite mistakes with the same feeling.
What This Skill Produces
- A decode of the specific ick: what exactly triggered it, and what category it's pointing at (values/incompatibility, safety/red-flag, attachment-pattern, or genuinely superficial)
- A verdict: real red flag (trust it, act) · genuine incompatibility (valid, no villain) · self-sabotage pattern (worth examining before acting) · superficial (let it pass) — with the reasoning, not a rubber stamp
- A pattern check: whether this ick fits a repeating cycle across the user's dating history (the tell of self-sabotage)
- A next move: what to actually do — end it cleanly, raise the real concern, sit with it a beat, or notice-and-let-go
Required Inputs
Ask for (if not already provided):
- The specific ick — the exact moment or thing, concretely ("he texted good morning three days running", not "something felt off")
- How the person has actually treated the user (the behavior, separate from the ick)
- The user's dating history pattern: do they often find a reason to end things right when it's getting real? do they ignore red flags for too long? (both are patterns)
- How they felt before the ick — into it, ambivalent, already looking for an exit?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 120 lines · 130 tokens per session scan A ba1fb2cc02f4
the-ick-decoder is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills (1,345 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 130 tokens to every session and 1,587 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
cursor
Always-on my-adhd-caveman. Off with "stop adhd-caveman" or "normal mode".
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
cli-error-handling
CLI command error handling patterns.
prefer-assertions-over-defensive-checks
Prefer assertions over defensive checks when data is guaranteed to be valid.