Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mrsuber/davinci-resolve-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/mrsuber/davinci-resolve-mcp/resolve-repo)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/mrsuber/davinci-resolve-mcp/resolve-repo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/mrsuber/davinci-resolve-mcp/resolve-repo/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/mrsuber/davinci-resolve-mcp/resolve-repo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/mrsuber/davinci-resolve-mcp/resolve-repo.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00221 | $0.00221 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00111 | $0.00111 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00044 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
resolve-repo scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to resolve-repo — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
This is the DaVinci Resolve MCP server: a Python MCP server (34 compound tools, 341 granular in --full mode) driving Resolve via its scripting API, plus an offline Node "advanced" server (18 tools) that authors .drp/.drt/.drx files and patches the project DB with no Resolve running. Kernel coverage: 136 guarded workflow actions.
- Canonical agent brief: AGENTS.md. Operating reference: docs/SKILL.md. Per-action depth: docs/kernels/*. Advanced (offline) catalog: resolve-advanced/README.md.
- Never modify, transcode, convert, proxy, relink, or create derivatives of source media unless explicitly asked. Analysis output goes to sidecars/scratch/the analysis project root.
- Do not duplicate version numbers, tool counts, or kernel-action counts into prose — they drift. Reference the docs above.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 13 lines · 221 tokens per session scan A a464a00b41bf
resolve-repo is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository mrsuber/davinci-resolve-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 221 tokens to every session, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to resolve-repo, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
cli-error-handling
CLI command error handling patterns.
prefer-assertions-over-defensive-checks
Prefer assertions over defensive checks when data is guaranteed to be valid.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.