Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mywand/cusrsor-do-itWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/mywand/cusrsor-do-it/workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/mywand/cusrsor-do-it/workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/mywand/cusrsor-do-it/workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/mywand/cusrsor-do-it/workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/mywand/cusrsor-do-it/workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.01163 | $0.01163 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00465 | $0.00465 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00233 | $0.00233 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00116 | $0.00116 |
Grade A, and why
workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
最近更新: 2025-09-18
工作流程
上下文获取不再使用单独"0."编号;以下两点在开始任何需求澄清前先完成:
- 若缺少 README 或说明:询问用户是否需要创建,不主动生成文档。
- 浏览现有代码(结构、语言、依赖、入口、测试)。
文档生成原则:默认情况下不创建任何说明文档或文档文件(README.md、设计文档、使用说明、架构说明等),除非用户明确要求。
1. 需求澄清
- 解析用户原始表述 -> 标准化需求列表(功能点、输入输出、非功能要求)。
- 列出假设与疑问;若不阻塞核心实现,可先标记“待确认”。
- 标注优先级:P0(必须)、P1(增强)、P2(可延后)。 退出准则:
- 需求列表经确认;关键边界(失败/异常/性能)已列入;“待确认”可闭环或不阻塞 P0。
2. 方案设计
- 选择语言 / 框架(给出理由与取舍)。
- 输出:目录结构、核心模块职责、数据/对象模型、时序 / 流程(Mermaid)。
- 评估复杂性与风险(性能 / 一致性 / 可扩展 / 安全)。 产出物:最小设计说明(结构/关键流/数据/异常与一致性)+ 观测点计划(指标/日志/Trace)。 退出准则:设计覆盖 P0 用例主/失败路径,并给出实现与回滚策略草案。
3. 实施步骤
- 搭建基础骨架(入口、依赖管理、配置)。
- 按增量顺序实现:数据模型 -> 核心逻辑 -> 接口/适配层 -> 异常与校验 -> 日志监控。
- 每个模块完成:自检(编译、最小测试、关键路径)。
- 仅在用户明确要求时编写或更新 README / 使用说明 / 示例。 退出准则:模块编译通过 + 基础测试通过 + 日志/指标/Trace 覆盖关键路径。
4. 代码质量内建
- 严格遵循
coding-standards.mdc。 - 关键算法 / 复杂逻辑增加注释块:意图 / 复杂度 / 边界。
- 输出前快速审视:命名、重复、职责、异常、日志噪音。
5. 问题排查流程
- 复现:最小输入 / 场景。
- 定位:阅读相关文件 -> 打印(若必要)-> 假设 -> 验证。
- 修复:编写回归测试或示例。
- 复盘:记录原因、防御性改进(文档或代码)。
6. 完成与反思
- 列出本次变更:新增 / 修改 / 删除。
- 风险与后续建议清单。
- 仅在用户明确要求时更新 README 的:功能目录、使用示例、已知限制。
- 标注"关键变更"摘要(供审阅快速把握差异)。
7. 任务管理规范
7.1 任务文档管理
- todo.md:存放待完成的任务
- todo-done.md:存放已完成的任务(含完成日期、成果)
- todo-pending.md:存放待完成的任务
- archive/:存放过程中的各种报告文档
7.2 任务迁移流程
- 任务完成后,从
todo.md移动到todo-done.md - 待完成任务从
todo-done.md移动到todo-pending.md - 过程报告文档移动到
archive/目录统一管理 - 定期清理
archive/目录(建议每季度一次)
7.3 任务模板
## [任务类型] 任务名称
**需求描述**:
- 具体需求说明
**预期成果**:
- 预期达成的目标
**优先级**:P0 / P1 / P2
**负责人**:姓名
**截止时间**:YYYY-MM-DD
8. 输出格式最小模板
用于阶段性答复或提交变更总结;对应关系:需求澄清(§1) → 方案摘要(§2) → 实现进度(§3) → 质量/风险(§4/5/6)。非正式架构/模块设计文档替代品。
TL;DR: 结论与本轮核心结果
需求澄清: 列点
方案摘要: 模块/流程/数据结构
实现进度: 已完成 / 待做
关键变更: 本轮对比上轮的主要差异
风险&后续: 列点
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 94 lines · 1,163 tokens per session scan A 0ba959d5f8a4
workflow is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository mywand/cusrsor-do-it (2 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 1,163 tokens to every session, about $0.0047 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.
config-validation-and-normalization
Config validation and normalization responsibilities (defineConfig normalizes, the orm section schema validates and resolves paths, the loader reports per-section diagnostics).
control-plane-descriptors
Control plane descriptor and instance implementation patterns.