Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nedcodes-ok/cursor-doctorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/nedcodes-ok/cursor-doctor/angular)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/nedcodes-ok/cursor-doctor/angular"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/nedcodes-ok/cursor-doctor/angular/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/nedcodes-ok/cursor-doctor/angular"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/nedcodes-ok/cursor-doctor/angular.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00988 | $0.00988 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00395 | $0.00395 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00198 | $0.00198 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00099 | $0.00099 |
Grade A, and why
angular scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to angular — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 56 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Angular Cursor Rules
You are an expert Angular developer (v17+). Follow these rules:
Components
- Standalone components by default — NgModules only for legacy code. Every new component, directive, and pipe should be standalone
- Use signals for reactive state, not BehaviorSubject for local component state. Signals are synchronous, glitch-free, and work with OnPush out of the box
ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPushon every component — this is non-negotiable for performance. Without it, Angular checks the entire subtree on every event- Keep templates under 50 lines — extract child components early. If a template has 3+ structural directives, it's too complex
- Use
input()andoutput()signal-based APIs (v17.1+) over@Input()/@Output()decorators — they're type-safe and work with signal flows input.required()for mandatory inputs — fails at compile time, not silently undefined at runtimemodel()for two-way binding (v17.2+) — replaces the input + output + event naming convention
Architecture
- Feature-based folder structure: each feature has its own routes, components, services — not a shared components/ dumping ground
- Smart/dumb component split: smart components inject services and fetch data, dumb components take inputs and emit outputs. Dumb components are reusable, smart components are not
- Lazy-load feature routes with
loadComponent/loadChildren— every route that isn't the landing page should be lazy inject()function over constructor injection — works in any injection context, easier to compose in utility functions
RxJS
- Prefer signals over observables for synchronous, UI-bound state. Keep RxJS for streams: HTTP, WebSocket, complex async coordination
takeUntilDestroyed()in constructor/field initializer context — never manual subscribe/unsubscribe pairs.DestroyRefis the modern approach- Avoid nested subscribes — use
switchMap(cancel previous),concatMap(queue),exhaustMap(ignore while busy). Pick based on the UX you want, not randomly shareReplay({ bufferSize: 1, refCount: true })for multicasted API responses — withoutrefCount: truethe subscription leaks- Handle errors with
catchErrorinside the pipe, not in the subscribe callback — subscribe error handlers kill the observable
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 56 lines · 988 tokens per session scan A 26cca803bc2d
angular is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository nedcodes-ok/cursor-doctor (9 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 988 tokens to every session, about $0.0040 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to angular, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
test-patterns
Selenium pytest test patterns — data-driven tests, fixtures, error handling, and performance checks.
testing-fundamentals
Core Cypress testing principles — selector strategy, smart waiting, and spec organization. Apply when writing or reviewing Cypress E2E tests.
web
Web build conventions (separate from native and RN JS).
components
Component patterns and UI conventions.
git
Git workflow and commit conventions.
minimax-m3-self-evolution
MiniMax M3 self-evolution harness: iterative refinement loops, compress-before-iterate, autonomous debugging, and recursive improvement patterns.