Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nedcodes-ok/cursor-doctorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/nedcodes-ok/cursor-doctor/refactoring)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/nedcodes-ok/cursor-doctor/refactoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/nedcodes-ok/cursor-doctor/refactoring/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/nedcodes-ok/cursor-doctor/refactoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/nedcodes-ok/cursor-doctor/refactoring.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00683 | $0.00683 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00273 | $0.00273 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00137 | $0.00137 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00068 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
refactoring scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to refactoring — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Refactoring Cursor Rules
You are an expert in systematic code refactoring. Follow these rules:
Before Refactoring
- Ensure tests exist for the code being refactored — no tests, no refactoring
- Run the full test suite before starting — establish a green baseline
- Commit the current state before making any changes
- Identify the specific code smell you're fixing — don't refactor "just because"
Guard Clauses & Early Returns
- Replace nested if/else with early returns for error cases
- Check preconditions at the top of the function, return/throw early
- Each guard clause should handle one condition — not compound boolean expressions
- After all guards pass, the main logic runs at the base indentation level
// ❌ Nested
function process(user) {
if (user) {
if (user.isActive) {
if (user.hasPermission) {
// actual logic buried 3 levels deep
}
}
}
}
// ✅ Guard clauses
function process(user) {
if (!user) throw new Error('User required');
if (!user.isActive) return;
if (!user.hasPermission) throw new ForbiddenError();
// actual logic at base level
}
Extract Function/Method
- Extract when a code block needs a comment explaining what it does — the function name IS the comment
- Extracted functions should do one thing and be nameable with a verb phrase
- Pass only what the extracted function needs — not the entire context/object
- If you extract and the original function is just a list of calls, that's good — it reads like a plan
Inline
- Inline when a function/variable adds indirection without clarity
- Inline temporary variables that are used once and the expression is clear
- Inline trivial delegating functions that just call another function
Rename
- Rename when the name doesn't match what the code does (after behavior changes)
- Use find-all-references, not find-and-replace — catch all usages including types
- Rename in a separate commit from behavior changes
Simplify Conditionals
- Replace complex boolean expressions with named boolean variables or functions
- Use De Morgan's laws to simplify negated compound conditions
- Replace switch/case with object lookup when mapping values
- Replace type-checking conditionals with polymorphism when the pattern repeats
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 80 lines · 683 tokens per session scan A c5c297793cbe
refactoring is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository nedcodes-ok/cursor-doctor (9 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 683 tokens to every session, about $0.0027 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to refactoring, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
test-patterns
Selenium pytest test patterns — data-driven tests, fixtures, error handling, and performance checks.
testing-fundamentals
Core Cypress testing principles — selector strategy, smart waiting, and spec organization. Apply when writing or reviewing Cypress E2E tests.
web
Web build conventions (separate from native and RN JS).
components
Component patterns and UI conventions.
git
Git workflow and commit conventions.
minimax-m3-self-evolution
MiniMax M3 self-evolution harness: iterative refinement loops, compress-before-iterate, autonomous debugging, and recursive improvement patterns.