Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/nedcodes-ok/cursorrules-collection/vitestgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nedcodes-ok/cursorrules-collectionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/nedcodes-ok/cursorrules-collection/vitest)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/nedcodes-ok/cursorrules-collection/vitest"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/nedcodes-ok/cursorrules-collection/vitest.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00647 | $0.00647 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00324 | $0.00324 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00129 | $0.00129 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00065 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
vitest scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- vitest — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 57 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Vitest Cursor Rules
You are an expert in Vitest testing. Follow these rules:
Test Structure
- Colocate test files with source: utils.ts → utils.test.ts (same directory)
- Use describe blocks to group related tests by function or behavior
- Test names describe expected behavior: it('returns empty array when no items match filter')
- Follow AAA pattern: Arrange, Act, Assert — separated by blank lines
- One assertion per test when possible, multiple only for closely related checks
Assertions
- Use expect().toBe() for primitives, expect().toEqual() for objects/arrays
- Use expect().toStrictEqual() when you care about undefined properties and class instances
- Use expect().toMatchObject() for partial object matching
- Use expect().toThrowError('message') to test error cases — always check the message
- Prefer specific matchers: .toContain(), .toHaveLength(), .toHaveProperty() over generic .toBe(true)
Mocking
- Use vi.mock('module') at the top of the file for module mocks
- Use vi.fn() for function mocks, vi.spyOn() when you need the original implementation
- Reset mocks in beforeEach or use { clearMocks: true } in vitest config
- Type mocks properly: vi.mocked(myFunction) to get typed mock instance
- Mock at the boundary (API calls, file system), not internal functions
Async Testing
- Use async/await in test functions — no done callbacks
- Use vi.useFakeTimers() and vi.advanceTimersByTime() for timer-dependent code
- Call vi.useRealTimers() in afterEach when using fake timers
- Use vi.waitFor() for testing async state changes
Coverage
- Configure coverage in vitest.config.ts: coverage: { provider: 'v8', reporter: ['text', 'html'] }
- Set coverage thresholds: statements: 80, branches: 80, functions: 80
- Exclude test files, configs, and type files from coverage
- Focus coverage on business logic, not framework glue code
Snapshot Testing
- Use toMatchInlineSnapshot() over toMatchSnapshot() — review changes in-place
- Snapshot simple serializable output only — not DOM trees or large objects
- Update snapshots intentionally with --update, never blindly
- Use expect().toMatchFileSnapshot() for large expected outputs
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 57 lines · 647 tokens per session scan A 8fb1b16596a3
vitest is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository nedcodes-ok/cursorrules-collection (37 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 647 tokens to every session, about $0.0032 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
07-testing
Cursor rule "07-testing" from orbitalsonic/AndroidPilot, covering testing, architecture, prefer, unit testing and scope.
80-testing-quality
Testing and code quality rules.
testing-pyramid-agent
Provides guidance on testing pyramid principles and how to analyze test distribution. Use this rule when discussing test distribution, test strategy, or when analyzing test coverage across unit, integration, and E2E tests.
vue-test-utils-auto
@vue/test-utils Standards for Vue 3 components and Vitest.
react-component-hook-testing-auto
Enforces best practices for unit testing React components and custom hooks using React Testing Library and Vitest.
vitest-best-practices-auto
Enforces best practices for Vitest unit tests.