Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nongjun/feishu-cursor-clawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/nongjun/feishu-cursor-claw/basic-rules)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/nongjun/feishu-cursor-claw/basic-rules"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/nongjun/feishu-cursor-claw/basic-rules/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/nongjun/feishu-cursor-claw/basic-rules"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/nongjun/feishu-cursor-claw/basic-rules.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.00060 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00024 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00012 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00006 |
Grade A, and why
basic-rules scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
1、Always respond in Chinese-simplified！ 2、只要合理，就分成多个子 agent 来执行！ 3、子 agent 应全部强制使用 opus4.6 ！ 4、所有的 Chat 要以中文命名！
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 10 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A a312d32fa9cc
basic-rules is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository nongjun/feishu-cursor-claw (14 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
code-optimization
Guidelines for optimizing duplicate and poorly structured code.
guardrails
Security guardrails applied to all AI interactions.
documentation-standards
Documentation standards for code, APIs, and architecture.
data-fetching
Data fetching patterns with TanStack Query, Server Components, and Supabase.
token-efficiency
Token optimization rules to reduce AI costs by 30%+.
mcp
Guidelines for implementing and interacting with the Task Master MCP Server.