Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nongjun/feishu-cursor-clawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/nongjun/feishu-cursor-claw/go)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/nongjun/feishu-cursor-claw/go"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/nongjun/feishu-cursor-claw/go/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/nongjun/feishu-cursor-claw/go"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/nongjun/feishu-cursor-claw/go.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00170 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00068 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00034 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00017 |
Grade A, and why
Go安全规范 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Go 安全
本文件以 Go 特定内容扩展通用安全规则。
密钥管理
apiKey := os.Getenv("OPENAI_API_KEY")
if apiKey == "" {
log.Fatal("OPENAI_API_KEY 未配置")
}
安全扫描
- 使用 gosec 进行静态安全分析：
gosec ./...
Context 与超时
始终使用 context.Context 进行超时控制：
ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(ctx, 5*time.Second)
defer cancel()
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 34 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 56d5166dc843
Go安全规范 is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository nongjun/feishu-cursor-claw (14 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 170 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
go
Go patterns: error wrapping, goroutines, interfaces.
go
Go patterns: error wrapping, goroutines, interfaces.
go-backend-scalability-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for Go development with backend scalability.
go-servemux-rest-api-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for Go development with ServeMux REST API integration.
go
Idiomatic Go rules. Explicit error handling, interface-based design, context-first concurrency.
go-temporal-dsl-prompt-file
Cursor rules for Go development with Temporal DSL integration.