Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/nongjun/feishu-cursor-claw/swiftgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nongjun/feishu-cursor-clawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/nongjun/feishu-cursor-claw/swift)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/nongjun/feishu-cursor-claw/swift"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/nongjun/feishu-cursor-claw/swift.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00388 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00194 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00078 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
Swift编码风格 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Swift 编码风格
本文件以 Swift 特定内容扩展通用编码风格规则。
格式化
- SwiftFormat 用于自动格式化，SwiftLint 用于风格检查
swift-format作为替代方案已内置于 Xcode 16+
不可变性
- 优先使用
let而非var——将所有变量定义为let，仅在编译器要求时改为var - 默认使用具有值语义的
struct；仅在需要标识或引用语义时使用class
命名
遵循 Apple API 设计指南：
- 在使用点保持清晰——省略不必要的词
- 根据角色而非类型命名方法和属性
- 使用
static let定义常量，而非全局常量
错误处理
使用类型化 throws（Swift 6+）和模式匹配：
func load(id: String) throws(LoadError) -> Item {
guard let data = try? read(from: path) else {
throw .fileNotFound(id)
}
return try decode(data)
}
并发
启用 Swift 6 严格并发检查。优先使用：
Sendable值类型用于跨隔离边界传递数据- Actor 用于共享可变状态
- 结构化并发（
async let、TaskGroup）优于非结构化的Task {}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 48 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 26c3e1a351fa
Swift编码风格 is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository nongjun/feishu-cursor-claw (14 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 388 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
04-kotlin
Cursor rule "04-kotlin" from orbitalsonic/AndroidPilot, covering kotlin rules, prefer, coroutines, null safety and naming.
kotlin-rules
You are a Senior Kotlin programmer with experience in the Android framework and a preference for clean programming and design patterns.
flutter-rules
You are an expert in Flutter, Dart, Riverpod, Freezed, Flutter Hooks, and Supabase.
java-kotlin
Rules applied when working in Java or Kotlin files (incl. Android).
swift6-migration
Guide for migrating Swift code to Swift 6 with concurrency and strict checking.
swift-argument-parser
Documentation and usage patterns for Swift Argument Parser for command-line tools.