Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oakensoul/nextjs-cursor-promptsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/oakensoul/nextjs-cursor-prompts/git-code-push)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/oakensoul/nextjs-cursor-prompts/git-code-push"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/oakensoul/nextjs-cursor-prompts/git-code-push/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/oakensoul/nextjs-cursor-prompts/git-code-push"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/oakensoul/nextjs-cursor-prompts/git-code-push.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.02688 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.01075 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00538 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00269 |
Grade A, and why
git-code-push scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 330 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Git Code Push Validation Guide
This prompt ensures comprehensive quality validation and production readiness before pushing commits to GitHub. ALL quality gates must pass before proceeding.
🎯 PUSH VALIDATION OBJECTIVES:
- EXECUTE comprehensive quality gates with zero tolerance for failures
- VALIDATE production readiness including security and performance
- VERIFY GitHub integration and CI/CD pipeline compatibility
- ASSESS deployment risk and rollback preparedness
- AUTHORIZE push execution only after all criteria are met
📋 COMPREHENSIVE VALIDATION PROCESS:
STEP 1: Code Quality Validation
Linting and Formatting Validation:
# Comprehensive code quality checks
npm run lint # ESLint validation with zero warnings
npm run lint:fix # Auto-fix what can be fixed
npm run format # Prettier formatting validation
npm run type-check # TypeScript strict type checking
Code Quality Gates:
- ESLint clean - Zero errors, zero warnings tolerated
- TypeScript strict - No type errors, proper interface usage
- Prettier compliant - Consistent code formatting
- Import organization - Clean import structure, no unused imports
- Dead code elimination - No unreachable or unused code
STEP 2: Testing Validation
Comprehensive Test Suite Execution:
# Full testing pipeline
npm run test # Complete unit test suite
npm run test:coverage # Coverage verification (>80% required)
npm run test:integration # Integration test validation
npm run test:e2e # End-to-end test execution (if available)
npm run test:accessibility # Accessibility compliance testing
Testing Quality Gates:
- Unit tests: 100% pass rate - No failing or skipped tests
- Coverage threshold met - Minimum 80% code coverage
- Integration tests pass - All integration scenarios validated
- E2E tests pass - Critical user journeys function correctly
- Accessibility tests pass - WCAG compliance verified
- Performance tests pass - No performance regressions detected
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 330 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 14b6c25fae62
git-code-push is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository oakensoul/nextjs-cursor-prompts (4 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,688 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
rebase-only-merged-agents
When rebasing after a merge, only rebase the agents whose branches you just merged. Do not rebase agents that are still running.
iris
GitHub operations specialist — branches, pull requests, issues, releases, tags. Called by zeus after review. Never pushes or merges without explicit human approval. Integrates with VS Code GitHub Pull Requests extension.
git-workflow
Rules for git operations, commit strategy, and GitHub CLI usage.
release-checklist
What to update with each code change or version release.
git-workflow
Git commit format and PR process - conventional commits.
branching-merging-strategy
This is a set of instructions to the AI Assistant for branching and merging strategy.