quality-review-code

quality-review-code is a cursor rule for Cursor from oakensoul/nextjs-cursor-prompts. It costs 19 tokens per session (1,490 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code review guide that checks implementation quality, documentation, and tests against project standards.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review files or directories, add or update code comments, and determine suitable unit, integration, accessibility, and other tests.
Why use it?
It helps reveal missing documentation and tests while encouraging small, low-risk changes that preserve the existing design.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/oakensoul/nextjs-cursor-prompts/quality-review-code
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oakensoul/nextjs-cursor-prompts

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for quality-review-code

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/oakensoul/nextjs-cursor-prompts/quality-review-code.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/oakensoul/nextjs-cursor-prompts/quality-review-code)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/oakensoul/nextjs-cursor-prompts/quality-review-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/oakensoul/nextjs-cursor-prompts/quality-review-code.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 19 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,490 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00019 $0.01490
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.00745
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00298
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00149

Measured 5d ago against content hash 04ba7e3925af, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

quality-review-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/prompts/quality/quality-review-code.mdc · 153 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 153 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.


title: Code Quality & Testing Review description: Comprehensive prompt for ensuring code meets project standards with appropriate documentation and testing tags: [prompt, code-quality, testing, documentation, standards] version: 2.0.0 lastUpdated: 2025-06-02 usage: Reference this prompt for any file or directory that needs quality review audience: [claude, ai-assistants] scope: [documentation, unit-testing, accessibility-testing, integration-testing]

Code Quality & Testing Request

IMPORTANT: This prompt requires completing ALL applicable tasks listed below. Do not skip any sections without explicitly explaining why.

FOLLOW MINIMAL CHANGE PRINCIPLES: When creating tests and documentation, preserve existing code patterns and architecture. Do not rewrite working code unnecessarily.

Please review the code I'm working on and ensure it meets our project standards. Based on the file types and functionality, determine which tasks are applicable:

Documentation Tasks

1. Update inline code documentation

  • Add/update JSDoc comments for all functions, components, and interfaces
  • Ensure parameters and return types are documented with descriptions
  • Document any complex logic or business rules
  • Add usage examples where helpful

2. Developer README.md

  • Evaluate if this code warrants its own README.md documentation
  • Create or update if it's a significant component, feature, or standalone module
  • Include: purpose, API/props, usage examples, and any special considerations

Testing Tasks

3. Unit Tests (evaluate applicability)

  • For Components: Test rendering, props, user interactions, error/loading states
  • For Server Actions: Test success cases, error handling, input validation
  • For API Routes: Test endpoints, request/response handling, authentication
  • For Utilities/Hooks: Test function behavior, edge cases, error conditions
  • Create appropriate test files following our vitest standards
  • Ensure 80%+ coverage

4. Accessibility Tests (evaluate applicability)

  • MANDATORY for ALL UI components that render visual elements to the DOM
  • Required for: Buttons, forms, navigation, modals, cards, layouts, any interactive elements
  • Skip for: Server actions, API routes, utilities, hooks, non-visual components, data services
  • Use vitest-axe to test for violations and keyboard navigation
  • Create separate .a11y.test.tsx files (NOT combined with unit tests)
  • Test all component variants and states for accessibility compliance

Read the full file on GitHub · 153 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 153 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 04ba7e3925af

Subscribe to this mod's changes

quality-review-code is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository oakensoul/nextjs-cursor-prompts (4 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 1,490 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.