quality-review-full

quality-review-full is a cursor rule for Cursor from oakensoul/nextjs-cursor-prompts. It costs 0 tokens per session (6,216 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A broad project-quality review guide that combines checks for code, security, accessibility, APIs, search visibility, and documentation.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to assess an entire project, coordinate specialized reviews, summarize the results, rank improvements, and store review history in project documentation.
Why use it?
It brings findings from separate review areas into one prioritized plan and keeps a record of quality work over time.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Written for Cursor: installed under .cursor/. Also seen: positional $N argument.

Good fit Use it to assess an entire project, coordinate specialized reviews, summarize the results, rank improvements, and store review history in project documentation.

Compare 6 cursor rules from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/oakensoul/nextjs-cursor-prompts/quality-review-full
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oakensoul/nextjs-cursor-prompts

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for quality-review-full

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/oakensoul/nextjs-cursor-prompts/quality-review-full/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/oakensoul/nextjs-cursor-prompts/quality-review-full)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/oakensoul/nextjs-cursor-prompts/quality-review-full"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/oakensoul/nextjs-cursor-prompts/quality-review-full/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for quality-review-full

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/oakensoul/nextjs-cursor-prompts/quality-review-full"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/oakensoul/nextjs-cursor-prompts/quality-review-full.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Nothing until a file matches its globs; then the whole rule loads.
When invoked 6,216 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.06216
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.03108
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.01243
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00622

Measured 10d ago against content hash 3cb4fc484cfd, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

quality-review-full scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/prompts/quality/quality-review-full.mdc · 703 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 703 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Comprehensive Quality Review Orchestrator

This prompt orchestrates a complete quality assessment across all project dimensions including code quality, security, accessibility, API design, SEO optimization, and documentation with consolidated reporting, prioritized action plans, and persistent quality documentation tracking.

🎯 COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OBJECTIVES:

  1. ORCHESTRATE multi-dimensional quality assessment across all project areas
  2. COORDINATE specialized reviews with consistent methodology and standards
  3. CONSOLIDATE findings into actionable, prioritized improvement roadmap
  4. ESTABLISH quality baseline with measurable metrics and tracking
  5. GENERATE executive summary with business impact and resource planning
  6. CREATE persistent documentation in docs/quality-review/ for historical tracking

📋 QUALITY ASSESSMENT ORCHESTRATION:

STEP 1: Pre-Assessment Setup and Planning

Assessment Workspace and Documentation Setup:
# Initialize comprehensive quality assessment with documentation tracking
echo "🔍 Initializing Comprehensive Quality Assessment with Documentation Tracking"
echo "=========================================================================="

# Create assessment workspace AND persistent documentation
ASSESSMENT_DATE=$(date +"%Y%m%d_%H%M%S")
PROJECT_NAME=$(basename $(pwd))
ASSESSMENT_DIR="quality_assessment_${ASSESSMENT_DATE}"
DOCS_QUALITY_DIR="docs/quality-review"

# Create both temporary workspace and persistent documentation
mkdir -p "$ASSESSMENT_DIR"/{reports,artifacts,recommendations}
mkdir -p "$DOCS_QUALITY_DIR"/{reports,historical,summaries}

echo "📁 Temporary workspace: $ASSESSMENT_DIR"
echo "📚 Persistent documentation: $DOCS_QUALITY_DIR"
echo "📅 Assessment date: $(date)"
echo "👤 Assessed by: $(git config user.name) <$(git config user.email)>"
echo "📂 Project: $PROJECT_NAME"

# Project inventory
echo -e "\n🏗️ Project Overview:"
echo "Repository: $(git remote get-url origin 2>/dev/null || echo 'Local repository')"
echo "Current branch: $(git branch --show-current)"
echo "Last commit: $(git log -1 --oneline)"
echo "Files tracked: $(git ls-files | wc -l)"

# Technology stack detection
echo -e "\n🛠️ Technology Stack:"
[ -f "package.json" ] && echo "- Node.js/JavaScript project detected"
[ -f "tsconfig.json" ] && echo "- TypeScript configuration found"
[ -f "next.config.js" ] && echo "- Next.js framework detected"
[ -f "tailwind.config.js" ] && echo "- Tailwind CSS detected"
[ -f "vitest.config.ts" ] && echo "- Vitest testing framework detected"
[ -f "cypress.config.js" ] && echo "- Cypress E2E testing detected"
[ -f ".eslintrc*" ] && echo "- ESLint configuration found"
[ -f "prettier.config.js" ] && echo "- Prettier configuration found"

Read the full file on GitHub · 703 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 703 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 3cb4fc484cfd

Subscribe to this mod's changes

quality-review-full is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository oakensoul/nextjs-cursor-prompts (4 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 6,216 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.