Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/omril321/automated-notebooklmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/omril321/automated-notebooklm/llm-zod-jsonschema)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/omril321/automated-notebooklm/llm-zod-jsonschema"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/omril321/automated-notebooklm/llm-zod-jsonschema/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/omril321/automated-notebooklm/llm-zod-jsonschema"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/omril321/automated-notebooklm/llm-zod-jsonschema.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00284 | $0.00284 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00142 | $0.00142 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00057 | $0.00057 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
llm-zod-jsonschema scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Cursor Rule: llm-zod-jsonschema
Title
Best Practice for LLM Output Parsing with Zod and JSON Schema
Rule
- Always use
zod-to-json-schemato generate a JSON schema from your Zod schema. - Inject the generated JSON schema into the LLM prompt to instruct the model on the expected output format.
- After receiving the LLM output, validate it using the original Zod schema.
- This ensures the prompt and validation are always in sync, and provides robust, type-safe, fail-fast error handling.
- Do not use
StructuredOutputParser.fromZodSchemaas the canonical pattern; this approach is now preferred for all LLM output parsing in this project.
Rationale
This pattern ensures schema/prompt synchronization, leverages Zod's type safety, and provides robust validation for all LLM output in TypeScript projects.
Example
import { z } from "zod";
import { zodToJsonSchema } from "zod-to-json-schema";
const outputSchema = z.object({ ... });
const jsonSchema = zodToJsonSchema(outputSchema);
// Inject jsonSchema into the LLM prompt
// After LLM returns output, validate with outputSchema.parse(output)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 37 lines · 284 tokens per session scan A b854aa0cce07
llm-zod-jsonschema is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository omril321/automated-notebooklm (15 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 284 tokens to every session, about $0.0014 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
baml
A set of rules for setting up BAML and help with syntax guidance.
co-dialectic
Co-Dialectic prompt sharpening and verification rules for Cursor.
prompt-routing
Route tasks to the correct Universal AI Engineering Prompt.
prompting-for-qe
Soạn/tinh chỉnh prompt cho tác vụ QE (sinh test case, phân tích requirement, tóm tắt tài liệu test, phân tích log) — đặc biệt khi output AI lan man, chung chung, bịa, hoặc muốn chốt prompt thành template tái dùng.
prompt-evals
Prompt eval fixtures — case design, assertions, versioning, CI gates, no PII in golden data.
012_GEPA_AIME_Tutorial
DSPY 3 GEPA AIME Tutorial - Math reasoning optimization achieving 46.7% to 56.7% improvement.