Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Opti-kjh/paletteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/opti-kjh/palette/tft-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/opti-kjh/palette/tft-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/opti-kjh/palette/tft-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/opti-kjh/palette/tft-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/opti-kjh/palette/tft-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00550 | $0.00550 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00275 | $0.00275 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00110 | $0.00110 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00055 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
tft-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
TFT Reviewer
기능 개발 전 TFT(Task Force Team) 구성원들의 상세 리뷰를 수행합니다. 팀원(PM, 개발팀, 디자인팀, QA팀)별 역할에 따른 의견을 수집하여 우선순위 체크리스트를 생성합니다.
사이드이펙트가 있는지 점검 후 진행해라. 주의사항: 절대 사이드이펙트가 발생해서는 안되며 다른 개발에 영향이 있어서도 안돼.
- mcp를 활용해서 개발해라.
- context7을 이용해서 공식문서에서 제공하는 방식을 통해서 구현해라.
- sequential thinking을 통해 단계적 의사코드를 작성하고 개선해라.
- 조직 구성원이 안건에 대한 TFT를 구성하고 구성원별 역할에 따른 의견을 제출해라.
-
최고 책임자 및 결정권자: CTO
-
PM : 제품에 대한 기획을 구상하고 안건에 대한 비즈니스 로직을 작성한다.
- 조직 구성
- 상위 PM(팀장)
- 제품 단위 PM
- 조직 구성
-
개발 : 코드와 구조, 아키텍처 검토 및 코드리뷰 수행 : 코드와 구조, 아키텍쳐, 스트럭쳐를 포함한 회의를 진행하고 코드리뷰를 면밀히 검토한 후 발견되거나 의심되는 부분에 대해서 검토할 수 있도록 목록화하고 목록은 개발 우선순위로 설정해.
- 조직 구성
- 백엔드 개발팀
- 시니어 3명
- 주니어 2명
- 웹 개발팀
- 시니어 3명
- 주니어 3명
- 모바일 개발팀
- 시니어 3명
- 주니어 2명
- 백엔드 개발팀
- 조직 구성
-
디자인 : UI/UX 관점에서 프론트엔드 디자인 검토 : 안건에 대한 디자인을 UI/UX 관점에서 고민해야 하고, 사용자가 이용에 불편함이 없어야 한다.
- 조직 구성
- 시니어 3명
- 주니어 2명
- 조직 구성
-
QA : 완성 또는 수정된 제품에 대해 QA를 진행하고 문제가 있을만한 부분을 조기에 탐지해서 개발 생산성을 높인다.
- 조직 구성
- QA Engineer
- Test Engineer
- 조직 구성
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 52 lines · 550 tokens per session scan A 13e56679af68
tft-reviewer is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository Opti-kjh/palette (1 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 550 tokens to every session, about $0.0028 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
cli-error-handling
CLI command error handling patterns.
prefer-assertions-over-defensive-checks
Prefer assertions over defensive checks when data is guaranteed to be valid.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.