Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Oriolshhh/runware-image-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/ui-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/ui-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/ui-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/ui-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp/ui-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00007 | $0.00357 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00179 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00071 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
ui-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Skill: ui-review
UI Review
Purpose
Give concrete, prioritized feedback on user-facing changes so they are accessible, usable, and consistent.
When to use it
- Any change that adds or modifies a user interface.
Instructions
- Check accessibility: semantic HTML, ARIA, keyboard and focus order, contrast.
- Verify loading, empty, error, and success states exist and are clear.
- Check forms: labels, validation, and error recovery.
- Assess hierarchy, spacing, responsiveness, and design-system consistency.
- Separate blocking issues from polish.
Output format
- Blocking issues with concrete remediations.
- Polish suggestions.
- Precise references to the affected component or screen.
Anti-patterns
- Vague aesthetic feedback with no action.
- Treating personal taste as an accessibility blocker.
- Ignoring keyboard-only and screen-reader users.
Verification checklist
- Check semantics, names/labels, tab order, focus visibility/restoration, contrast, zoom, responsive reflow, reduced motion, and error recovery.
- Exercise loading, empty, error, success, disabled, and permission-denied states that apply.
- Attach reproduction evidence and WCAG references to blocking findings.
Apply
context-discoverybefore broad scanning: use a supplied context capsule first; otherwise check context frontmatter freshness, read.agent/context/routing.md, load only relevant summaries, and verify critical claims against source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 45 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A 0c488a4a7bbc
ui-review is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository Oriolshhh/runware-image-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 357 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
external-scale
Source: docs/agents/external-scale.md Regenerate: npm run agents:sync -w packages/openbridge-webcomponents -->.
codex-premium-website-skills
Apply Codex Skills standards to frontend, website, motion, accessibility, QA, agent reasoning, and handoff work.
ui-components
USE WHEN: Building UI components, structuring layouts, and applying styles using Tailwind CSS.
ui-motion-workflow
Orchestrate motion-aware UI work by sequencing direction, provider choice, implementation, and browser validation.
mobile-first-ui
Mobile-first UI for settings, dialogs, and lists — smaller type, stacked layouts, nested add dialogs.
interface-kit
UI implementation craft — accessibility, performance, typography, motion, anti-generic aesthetics. Read when building/polishing UI after direction is chosen. Does NOT replace redesign multi-model competition.