testing-workflow

A testing rule for a Swift codebase. It says to run focused tests while developing and the complete test suite only once, immediately before creating a pull request.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to choose between filtered tests, a compilation check, and the full test suite during development and before submitting changes.
Why use it?
It avoids spending about 30 minutes running thousands of unrelated tests after every small change while still requiring a final full check.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/osaurus-ai/osaurus/testing-workflow
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/osaurus-ai/osaurus

Made for: Cursor.

Per session 278 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 278 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00278 $0.00278
Opus 5 $0.00139 $0.00139
Sonnet 5 $0.00056 $0.00056
Haiku 4.5 $0.00028 $0.00028

Measured yesterday against content hash 7c1df8727cd7, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

testing-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/testing-workflow.mdc · 39 lines

What it actually says

Testing Workflow

The full unit suite (make test, ~5000 tests) takes about 30 minutes. Do NOT run it during normal development iterations.

During development

  • Run only targeted tests scoped to what you changed, using --filter:
OSAURUS_DISABLE_KEYCHAIN_FOR_TESTS=1 \
OSAURUS_TEST_ROOT=/tmp/osaurus-test \
OSU_MODELS_DIR=/tmp/osaurus-test-models \
swift test --package-path Packages/OsaurusCore --filter "SuiteOrTestName"
  • A plain swift build --package-path Packages/OsaurusCore is enough to verify compilation after edits.

Before submitting a PR

  • Run the full suite exactly once, right before the PR is created:
OSAURUS_DISABLE_KEYCHAIN_FOR_TESTS=1 \
OSAURUS_TEST_ROOT=/tmp/osaurus-test \
OSU_MODELS_DIR=/tmp/osaurus-test-models \
make test
  • Keychain-gated suites (e.g. PluginAgentScopingTests) fail by design under OSAURUS_DISABLE_KEYCHAIN_FOR_TESTS=1; run those without the flag when their area was touched.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 39 lines · 278 tokens per session scan A 7c1df8727cd7

Subscribe to this mod's changes

testing-workflow is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository osaurus-ai/osaurus (7,740 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 278 tokens to every session, about $0.0014 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.