standard-e2e-writing-e2e-tests

Team rules for writing end-to-end tests, which test a feature through the application as a user would. Each feature must have its own specification file and use the project's shared Playwright fixtures.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use them when adding or reviewing end-to-end tests in the Packmind project.
Why use it?
They make test setup, test data, and feature-flag handling consistent across the test suite.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/packmindhub/packmind/standard-e2e-writing-e2e-tests
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PackmindHub/packmind

Made for: Cursor.

Per session 150 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 150 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00150 $0.00150
Opus 5 $0.00075 $0.00075
Sonnet 5 $0.00030 $0.00030
Haiku 4.5 $0.00015 $0.00015

Measured 2d ago against content hash 33a84488d67d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

standard-e2e-writing-e2e-tests scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

apps/e2e-tests/.cursor/rules/packmind/standard-e2e-writing-e2e-tests.mdc · 11 lines

What it actually says

Standard: [E2E] Writing E2E tests

Writing proper E2E tests with our stack. Each feature we add should have its own spec file. :

  • Always use the fixtures (testWithApi, testWithUser...) instead of the default test of Playwright
  • Data which are not relevant to the test itself should be created using API
  • Specify "testWithApi.use({ underFeatureFlag: true });" in the test file is the tested feature is under a feature flag.

Full standard is available here for further request: [E2E] Writing E2E tests

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 11 lines · 150 tokens per session scan A 33a84488d67d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

standard-e2e-writing-e2e-tests is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository PackmindHub/packmind (306 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 150 tokens to every session, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.