Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/pdufour/browser-use-wasm/llm-intent-parsinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pdufour/browser-use-wasmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/pdufour/browser-use-wasm/llm-intent-parsing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/pdufour/browser-use-wasm/llm-intent-parsing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/pdufour/browser-use-wasm/llm-intent-parsing.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00245 | $0.00245 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00122 | $0.00122 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00049 | $0.00049 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
llm-intent-parsing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 14 lines · 245 tokens per session scan A 38479078b670
llm-intent-parsing is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository pdufour/browser-use-wasm (15 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 245 tokens to every session, about $0.0012 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
baml
A set of rules for setting up BAML and help with syntax guidance.
co-dialectic
Co-Dialectic prompt sharpening and verification rules for Cursor.
prompt-routing
Route tasks to the correct Universal AI Engineering Prompt.
prompting-for-qe
Soạn/tinh chỉnh prompt cho tác vụ QE (sinh test case, phân tích requirement, tóm tắt tài liệu test, phân tích log) — đặc biệt khi output AI lan man, chung chung, bịa, hoặc muốn chốt prompt thành template tái dùng.
llm-zod-jsonschema
Best Practice for LLM Output Parsing with Zod and JSON Schema.
prompt-evals
Prompt eval fixtures — case design, assertions, versioning, CI gates, no PII in golden data.