Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Peiiii/nextclawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/peiiii/nextclaw/commit-message-english)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/peiiii/nextclaw/commit-message-english"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/peiiii/nextclaw/commit-message-english/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/peiiii/nextclaw/commit-message-english"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/peiiii/nextclaw/commit-message-english.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00128 | $0.00128 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00051 | $0.00051 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00026 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00013 |
Grade A, and why
commit-message-english scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Commit Message Language
All git commit messages must be written in English.
- Use conventional commit format:
type(scope): subject - Keep subject line under 72 characters
- Body and footer in English
# ✅ GOOD
git commit -m "fix(ncp): resolve stream encoder tool call ordering"
git commit -m "feat(api): add pagination support"
# ❌ BAD
git commit -m "修复 NCP 流式编码器问题"
git commit -m "新增分页功能"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 23 lines · 128 tokens per session scan A b8b44b096757
commit-message-english is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository Peiiii/nextclaw (261 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 128 tokens to every session, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
git-commits
Apply when generating git commit messages, performing commits, pushing to remote, or suggesting commit-related changes. Enforces Conventional Commits format and pre-push CI verification.
git-commits
Git commit safety — commits are human-only; AI suggests, never executes.
04-commit-style
Branch, commit, and PR conventions.
git-interaction
Git workflow, permissions, and all git message standards.
no-ai-contributors
Never add AI tools as git authors or project contributors.
git-discipline
Commit, push, and branching rules. Owns ALL git behavior; other files state only their deviations.