Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Pranav-Karra-3301/tuckWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/pranav-karra-3301/tuck/ui)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/pranav-karra-3301/tuck/ui"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/pranav-karra-3301/tuck/ui/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/pranav-karra-3301/tuck/ui"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/pranav-karra-3301/tuck/ui.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00455 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00182 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00091 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00046 |
Grade A, and why
ui scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
UI Rules
Color Palette
| Color | Usage |
|---|---|
| Cyan | Primary brand, headings, emphasis |
| Green | Success states, confirmations |
| Yellow | Warnings, modifications |
| Red | Errors, deletions |
| Dim/Gray | Secondary info, paths, hints |
Command Structure
Every command should follow this pattern:
prompts.intro('tuck commandname');
// ... work with spinners/progress ...
prompts.note("Run 'tuck next' to continue", 'Next step');
prompts.outro('Done!');
Spinners
Use for operations >100ms:
const spinner = prompts.spinner();
spinner.start('Processing files...');
try {
await doWork();
spinner.stop('Processed 5 files');
} catch (error) {
spinner.stop('Failed to process');
throw error;
}
Progress Feedback
For multi-step operations:
- Show what's being done
- Show progress (X of Y)
- Show completion status
prompts.log.step(`Syncing file ${i}/${total}: ${filename}`);
Confirmations
ALWAYS confirm destructive actions:
const confirmed = await prompts.confirm(
'Delete all backups?',
false // Default to NO (safe option)
);
if (!confirmed) {
prompts.cancel('Operation cancelled');
return;
}
Error Messages
Provide helpful, actionable errors:
// Good
throw new FileNotFoundError(path, {
suggestion: "Run 'tuck add' first to track this file"
});
// Bad
throw new Error('File not found');
Interactive Mode
Every command should support:
- Interactive mode (default) - prompts for input
- Non-interactive mode (--yes, --force) - for scripts
Next Steps
Always end successful operations with guidance:
prompts.note("Run 'tuck push' to upload changes", 'Next step');
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 102 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 2c8d93829fb9
ui is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository Pranav-Karra-3301/tuck (15 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 455 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
hatch3r-component-conventions
Component structure, styling tokens, loading/error/empty states, form validation timing, and accessible label patterns for Vue, React, and JSX.
security-archive
Socket.dev security data integration and security selectors.
code-validation-workflow
Code validation workflow (format, lint, test, coverage, typecheck).
cli-forge-schema
Generate GitHub-compatible Mermaid diagrams — auto-picks diagram type, splits complex ones, converts tables/kanban/PERT.
modus-themes-react
6 Modus themes with proper switching and persistence.
modus-icons-react
Essential icon usage rules for Modus Design System.