Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/prisma/prisma-nextWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/prisma/prisma-next/no-family-vocabulary-in-framework)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/prisma/prisma-next/no-family-vocabulary-in-framework"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/prisma/prisma-next/no-family-vocabulary-in-framework/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/prisma/prisma-next/no-family-vocabulary-in-framework"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/prisma/prisma-next/no-family-vocabulary-in-framework.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00476 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00238 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00095 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
no-family-vocabulary-in-framework scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
No family vocabulary in the framework domain
packages/1-framework is consumed by every family (SQL, Mongo) and every target. A concept may enter it only if it is genuinely family-blind.
The test for every new framework export, field, hook, or member: would Mongo populate or consume this meaningfully? If not, it belongs in the family layer (e.g. @prisma-next/sql-contract), behind a structural interface + type predicate at the boundary.
Do
- Keep framework mechanisms family-blind: registries, opaque payloads (
object | undefinednarrowed by the consuming family), merge/collision plumbing. - Put family vocabulary (
nativeType, CHECK constraints, schema qualification, dialect names) in the owning family layer; targets implement family interfaces structurally. - Express strategies as codec-owned hooks/behavior on the strategy owner's descriptor — never as string-enum fields threaded through shared types (see
storage-type-hooks.mdc). - Run
pnpm lint:framework-vocabulary— a committed high-water-mark threshold over a forbidden-term list (scripts/lint-framework-vocabulary.config.json); the count may only shrink, and the recorded threshold must be lowered whenever it does.
Don't
- Don't add a family term to a framework type because a sibling already has one — pre-existing surface is grandfathered debt (tracked, e.g. TML-2966), never precedent for new surface.
- Don't dress family concepts as generic. The tells, each seen in practice: a
never-typed parameter bridge to make a family callback assignable; a shape "declared here (not imported from the family) so the surface stays family-agnostic"; a'strategy-a' | 'strategy-b'union naming family mechanisms; a doc comment that needs a family example to explain the member. - Don't argue by analogy to an existing framework member without checking the analogy's ground:
renderValueLiteralis framework because Mongo renders value literals; a member only SQL renders is not.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 25 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A dcf438be1c62
no-family-vocabulary-in-framework is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository prisma/prisma-next (418 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 476 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
as-contract-cast-smell
// ❌ WRONG — bypasses the family ContractSerializer seam const contract = JSON.parse(raw) as Contract; const contract = JSON.parse(raw) as Contract .
no-backward-compatibility
Do not add backward-compatibility shims or migration scaffolding.
query-optimization
A database performance rule that requires measuring PostgreSQL queries with EXPLAIN ANALYZE under the same user permissions and row-level security (RLS) conditions used in production.
ehs-ims-conventions
EHS IMS app — RBAC, data layer, tRPC, migrations, AI boundaries.
sync-timedb-archive-janitor-contract
Day-close / cold-path worker contracts for synctimedb (A invariants; B tick coordinator retired).
schema
Scalable and secure schema design patterns for relational databases, NoSQL, and APIs. / TR: İlişkisel veri tabanları, NoSQL ve API'ler için ölçeklenebilir ve güvenli şema tasarım kalıpları.