Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/prisma/prisma-next/review-scope-overridesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/prisma/prisma-nextWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/prisma/prisma-next/review-scope-overrides)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/prisma/prisma-next/review-scope-overrides"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/prisma/prisma-next/review-scope-overrides.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00161 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00081 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00032 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
review-scope-overrides scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review scope overrides
When producing local PR/branch review artifacts (walkthroughs, code reviews, design reviews), honor an explicitly-provided base/parent branch.
Rules
- If the user specifies a parent branch (e.g.
spec/prisma-next-psl-contract-authoring), use that as the base for the review range:origin/<base>...HEAD
- Do not “helpfully” substitute
origin/HEAD/origin/mainwhen a base is explicitly given. - If the base branch name is ambiguous (local vs remote), resolve it to
origin/<base>when possible and record the resolved range in the review artifacts.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 17 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 94dce6c8d05b
review-scope-overrides is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository prisma/prisma-next (419 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 161 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
cli-error-handling
CLI command error handling patterns.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.
control-plane-descriptors
Control plane descriptor and instance implementation patterns.
family-instance-domain-actions
Family instance domain action implementation patterns.
import-validation
Import validation and package layering rules.
no-target-branches
Never branch on target - use adapters instead.