freestyle.strict

freestyle.strict is a cursor rule for Cursor from pylarco/diff-apply. It costs 0 tokens per session (74 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A project-wide rule file that always applies and says to use Tailwind CSS version 4 syntax. Tailwind CSS is a tool that generates styles from utility classes and CSS imports.

In plain words
What is it for?
Keeping frontend styling changes compatible with the project's Tailwind CSS 4 configuration.
Why use it?
It prevents developers from adding a deprecated Tailwind configuration file or using the wrong setup.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/pylarco/diff-apply/freestyle.strict
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pylarco/diff-apply

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for freestyle.strict

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/pylarco/diff-apply/freestyle.strict.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/pylarco/diff-apply/freestyle.strict)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/pylarco/diff-apply/freestyle.strict"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/pylarco/diff-apply/freestyle.strict.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Nothing until a file matches its globs; then the whole rule loads.
When invoked 74 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.00074
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00037
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00015
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00007

Measured 2d ago against content hash 10a61c25e803, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

freestyle.strict scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/freestyle.strict.mdc · 11 lines

What it actually says


description: globs: alwaysApply: true

tailwind.config.js file is deprecated in Tailwind CSS v4. do not use tailwind.config.js. Tailwind CSS v4 only needs @import "tailwindcss"; in the CSS file.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 11 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 10a61c25e803

Subscribe to this mod's changes

freestyle.strict is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository pylarco/diff-apply (10 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 74 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-02.