cloud-security

cloud-security is a cursor rule for Cursor from rajitsaha/100xprism. It costs 10 tokens per session (3,605 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A security review for cloud systems, including access controls, privacy, APIs, containers, and compliance.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for reviewing Google Cloud projects, Docker setups, infrastructure files, personal data handling, and security controls.
Why use it?
It helps find weaknesses that could expose data, allow excessive access, or leave cloud deployments poorly protected.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/rajitsaha/100xprism/cloud-security
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rajitsaha/100xprism

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for cloud-security

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/rajitsaha/100xprism/cloud-security.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/rajitsaha/100xprism/cloud-security)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/rajitsaha/100xprism/cloud-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/rajitsaha/100xprism/cloud-security.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 10 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 3,605 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00010 $0.03605
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.01802
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00721
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00361

Measured yesterday against content hash 53bc77de2fc1, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

cloud-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/cloud-security.mdc · 238 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 238 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Cloud Security — Cloud Security & Data Privacy Scan

Covers GCP infrastructure hardening, data privacy (PII/GDPR/CCPA), API security, container security, and compliance.

Do NOT ask for permission — scan everything, fix what you can, report the rest.


Step 0 — Detect cloud config

PROJECT_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
INSTRUCTION_FILE=$(for f in CLAUDE.md AGENTS.md .cursorrules; do [ -f "$PROJECT_ROOT/$f" ] && echo "$PROJECT_ROOT/$f" && break; done)
GCP_PROJECTS=$(grep -rh "GCP_PROJECT\|GOOGLE_CLOUD_PROJECT\|gcloud.*--project" ${INSTRUCTION_FILE:-/dev/null} .env.example terraform/ 2>/dev/null | grep -oE '[a-z][a-z0-9-]{4,28}' | sort -u | grep -v "^--" || true)
HAS_DOCKER=$(ls Dockerfile docker-compose.yml 2>/dev/null | head -1 || true)
HAS_TERRAFORM=$(ls terraform/*.tf infra/*.tf 2>/dev/null | head -1 || true)

Section 1 — GCP IAM & Access Control

For each GCP project detected:

for PROJECT in $GCP_PROJECTS; do
  echo "=== IAM: $PROJECT ==="
  gcloud projects get-iam-policy "$PROJECT" --format=json 2>/dev/null \
    | python3 -c "
import sys,json
p=json.load(sys.stdin)
bad=['roles/editor','roles/owner','roles/iam.securityAdmin','roles/storage.admin']
[print('[HIGH]',b['role'],m) for b in p.get('bindings',[]) for m in b['members'] if b['role'] in bad and ('serviceAccount' in m or 'allUsers' in m)]"
  gcloud iam service-accounts list --project="$PROJECT" --format="value(email)" 2>/dev/null \
    | while read SA; do
        n=$(gcloud iam service-accounts keys list --iam-account="$SA" --filter="keyType=USER_MANAGED" --format="value(KEY_ID)" 2>/dev/null | wc -l)
        [ "$n" -gt 0 ] && echo "[HIGH] $SA: $n user-managed key(s) — use Workload Identity instead"
      done
  gcloud projects get-iam-policy "$PROJECT" --format=json 2>/dev/null | grep -E "allUsers|allAuthenticatedUsers" && echo "[CRITICAL] Public IAM binding found" || true
done

Section 2 — GCP Network & Firewall

Read the full file on GitHub · 238 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 238 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 53bc77de2fc1

Subscribe to this mod's changes

cloud-security is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository rajitsaha/100xprism (10 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 3,605 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.