Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rajitsaha/100xprismWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/rajitsaha/100xprism/push)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/rajitsaha/100xprism/push"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/rajitsaha/100xprism/push/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/rajitsaha/100xprism/push"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/rajitsaha/100xprism/push.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.01654 | $0.01654 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00827 | $0.00827 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00331 | $0.00331 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00165 | $0.00165 |
Grade A, and why
push scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 193 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Push — Gate → Push → Monitor CI/CD
Quality gate re-runs before pushing. Do NOT push if any gate fails. Do NOT ask for permission; never use --no-verify or --force.
Phase 0 — Quality Gate (MANDATORY)
Check gate cache first — skip if it already passed for this exact tree state. The cache
is keyed on a tree token (HEAD + tracked diff + untracked files), not a bare HEAD, so a
dirty or rebased tree never reuses a stale pass — the same token /commit writes and the
gate-on-commit hook checks:
TOKEN=$(python3 ~/100xprism/hooks/gate-pass.py --print 2>/dev/null)
CACHED=$(cat ~/.100xprism/gate-cache 2>/dev/null)
[ -n "$TOKEN" ] && [ "$CACHED" = "$TOKEN" ] && echo "Gate: skipped (already passed for this tree)" && GATE_DONE=true || GATE_DONE=false
If GATE_DONE=false: run the gate workflow. On pass, record it:
python3 ~/100xprism/hooks/gate-pass.py
Do NOT push until gate passes. If gate fails → STOP, fix, clear cache, new commit, re-run.
Phase 0b — Code Review (pre-push)
Check review cache — skip if HEAD already reviewed by a prior /commit run:
HEAD=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
REVIEWED=$(cat ~/.100xprism/review-cache 2>/dev/null)
[ "$REVIEWED" = "$HEAD" ] && echo "Review: skipped (already done for $HEAD)" && REVIEW_DONE=true || REVIEW_DONE=false
If REVIEW_DONE=false, review unpushed commits now:
PR=$(gh pr list --head "$(git branch --show-current)" --json number -q '.[0].number' 2>/dev/null)
- PR exists → run the code-review skill:
/review $PR - No PR → spawn one review Agent on
git diff origin/main..HEADcovering the five dimensions defined in the commit skill Phase 5 (bugs, security, architecture, design, CLAUDE.md). Single-pass — no separate agents per dimension.
On clean review:
echo "$HEAD" > ~/.100xprism/review-cache
Critical or High issues → fix, new commit, clear cache, re-run gate. Do NOT push. Minor issues → logged, non-blocking.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 193 lines · 1,654 tokens per session scan A 09e2f2050c21
push is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository rajitsaha/100xprism (10 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 1,654 tokens to every session, about $0.0083 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
cli-error-handling
CLI command error handling patterns.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.
control-plane-descriptors
Control plane descriptor and instance implementation patterns.