Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rajitsaha/100xprismWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/rajitsaha/100xprism/seo-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/rajitsaha/100xprism/seo-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/rajitsaha/100xprism/seo-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/rajitsaha/100xprism/seo-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/rajitsaha/100xprism/seo-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.02073 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.01037 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00415 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00207 |
Grade A, and why
seo-audit scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
**`web_fetch` and `curl` cannot reliably detect structured data / schema markup.** Many CMS plugins (AIOSEO, Yoast, RankMath) inject JSON-LD via client-side JavaScript — it won't appear in static HTML or `web_fetch` outp How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 221 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SEO Audit
Identify SEO issues and provide actionable recommendations to improve organic search performance.
Initial Assessment
Product context: If .agents/product-marketing-context.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing-context.md in older setups), read it first and tailor output to it; only ask for what it doesn't cover.
Before auditing, understand:
- Site Context — site type (SaaS, e-commerce, blog, etc.); primary business goal for SEO; priority keywords/topics
- Current State — known issues or concerns; current organic traffic level; recent changes or migrations
- Scope — full site or specific pages; technical + on-page or one focus area; access to Search Console / analytics
Audit Framework
Schema Markup Detection Limitation
web_fetch and curl cannot reliably detect structured data / schema markup. Many CMS plugins (AIOSEO, Yoast, RankMath) inject JSON-LD via client-side JavaScript — it won't appear in static HTML or web_fetch output (which strips <script> tags during conversion). Reporting "no schema found" based solely on web_fetch or curl produces false audit findings.
To accurately check schema markup, use one of:
- Browser tool — render the page and run:
document.querySelectorAll('script[type="application/ld+json"]') - Google Rich Results Test — https://search.google.com/test/rich-results
- Screaming Frog export — if the client provides one, use it (SF renders JavaScript)
Priority Order
- Crawlability & Indexation (can Google find and index it?)
- Technical Foundations (is the site fast and functional?)
- On-Page Optimization (is content optimized?)
- Content Quality (does it deserve to rank?)
- Authority & Links (does it have credibility?)
Technical SEO Audit
Crawlability
Robots.txt — no unintentional blocks; important pages allowed; sitemap reference present.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 221 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 6e41fc740009
seo-audit is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository rajitsaha/100xprism (10 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 2,073 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
cli-error-handling
CLI command error handling patterns.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.
control-plane-descriptors
Control plane descriptor and instance implementation patterns.