Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RanaNadeemAslam/android-ai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/rananadeemaslam/android-ai-skills/security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/rananadeemaslam/android-ai-skills/security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/rananadeemaslam/android-ai-skills/security/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/rananadeemaslam/android-ai-skills/security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/rananadeemaslam/android-ai-skills/security.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01273 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00509 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00255 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00127 |
Grade A, and why
security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 163 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an expert in Android app security. Follow OWASP mobile guidelines and official Android security recommendations. Never store secrets in source code, encrypt sensitive data, and validate all external input.
Sensitive Data Storage
Source: https://developer.android.com/topic/security/best-practices#sensitive-data
DO:
- Use
EncryptedSharedPreferencesfor sensitive key-value data:
val encryptedPrefs = EncryptedSharedPreferences.create(
context,
"secure_prefs",
MasterKey.Builder(context).setKeyScheme(MasterKey.KeyScheme.AES256_GCM).build(),
EncryptedSharedPreferences.PrefKeyEncryptionScheme.AES256_SIV,
EncryptedSharedPreferences.PrefValueEncryptionScheme.AES256_GCM,
)
- Use
EncryptedFilefor sensitive file storage - Store auth tokens in encrypted storage, never in plain SharedPreferences or DataStore
- Clear sensitive data when user logs out
DON'T:
- Store passwords, tokens, or PII in plain SharedPreferences
- Store sensitive data in external storage (SD card)
- Log sensitive data (tokens, passwords, PII) — even in debug builds
- Store sensitive data in the app database without encryption
Secrets Management
DO:
- Store API keys in
local.properties(git-ignored) and inject via BuildConfig:
// build.gradle.kts
android {
defaultConfig {
val apiKey = project.findProperty("API_KEY") as? String ?: ""
buildConfigField("String", "API_KEY", "\"$apiKey\"")
}
}
- Use environment variables in CI/CD for secrets
- Use server-side proxy for sensitive API keys when possible (don't ship third-party API keys in APK)
DON'T:
- Hardcode API keys, secrets, or credentials in source code
- Commit
local.propertiesto version control - Ship production API keys in the APK — they can be extracted via reverse engineering
- Use
BuildConfig.DEBUGas a security gate — it's easily bypassed
Network Security
Source: https://developer.android.com/training/articles/security-config
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 163 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 59ed9582ad39
security is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository RanaNadeemAslam/android-ai-skills (6 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,273 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
kotlin
Android finance precision, RTL/i18n, and Kotlin AI skill rules.
enterprise-design
Produce a comprehensive technical blueprint for a web product or SaaS, suitable for implementation in Figma Make, engineering sprints, an...
docs
You are a documentation engineer.
techdebt
Find and eliminate technical debt across the whole codebase — duplicated code, dead code, redundant abstractions.
swiftui-accessibility
SwiftUI accessibility rules for VoiceOver — labels, hints, traits, values, and attribute preservation.
android-gradle-build-logic
Shape Android build logic with Gradle, version catalogs, plugins, convention patterns, and toolchain compatibility.